iPhone 16 vs. vivo X200 Pro mini: Which Compact Flagship Delivers More?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term software support and a refined ecosystem, the iPhone 16 is the safer bet. However, the vivo X200 Pro mini’s significantly faster 90W charging and potentially higher peak performance from the Dimensity 9400 make it a compelling choice for power users and those seeking cutting-edge technology.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Apple iPhone 16 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 53, 66 - A3287 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 53, 66, 70, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A3287 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 09 | 2024, October 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 20 | Available. Released 2024, October 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Ceramic Shield), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame |
| Dimensions | 147.6 x 71.6 x 7.8 mm (5.81 x 2.82 x 0.31 in) | 150.8 x 71.8 x 8.2 mm (5.94 x 2.83 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time; International)· eSIM + eSIM (8 or more, max 2 at a time; USA)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (China) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Ceramic Shield glass (2024 gen), Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1179 x 2556 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.7 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.31 inches, 98.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super Retina XDR OLED, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (typ), 2000 nits (HBM) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Hexa-core (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.20 GHz) | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Apple A18 (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) |
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core graphics) | Immortalis-G925 |
| OS | iOS 18, upgradable to iOS 26.1 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), stereo sound rec. | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, Dolby Vision HDR, 3D (spatial) audio, stereo sound rec. | HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K, 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, DisplayPort | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min 25W wireless (MagSafe), 15W wireless (China only) 15W wireless (Qi2) 4.5W reverse wired | 90W wired 30W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3561 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Pink, Teal, Ultramarine | Black, White, Green, Pink |
| Models | A3287, A3081, A3286, A3288, iPhone17,3 | V2419A |
| Price | $ 494.93 / C$ 945.75 / £ 569.99 / € 678.57 / ₹ 66,900 | About 610 EUR |
| SAR | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.24 W/kg (head) 1.41 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 37:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Apple iPhone 16
- Exceptional battery endurance (37 hours)
- Industry-leading display brightness (1708 nits)
- Seamless Apple ecosystem integration
- Slower charging speeds compared to vivo
- Potentially lower peak performance than Dimensity 9400
- Less flexible software customization
vivo X200 Pro mini
- Blazing-fast 90W wired charging
- Potentially higher CPU performance with Dimensity 9400
- More open software environment
- Battery endurance is unknown
- Software support may be less consistent than Apple
- Ecosystem integration is less refined
Display Comparison
The iPhone 16 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1708 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the X200 Pro mini’s display specs are currently unknown, vivo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The iPhone’s likely use of LTPO technology will contribute to more efficient power consumption, dynamically adjusting refresh rates. The iPhone’s color accuracy is expected to be industry-leading, a hallmark of Apple displays. The X200 Pro mini will need to match or exceed these metrics to compete effectively.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the X200 Pro mini, a direct comparison is limited. However, vivo’s flagship devices typically prioritize camera innovation. The iPhone 16 will likely continue Apple’s computational photography approach, focusing on natural-looking images and excellent video stabilization. The X200 Pro mini may emphasize larger sensors and advanced image processing algorithms. The iPhone’s strength lies in its consistent image quality across all lenses and its exceptional video recording capabilities. The X200 Pro mini will need to deliver comparable or superior image quality to justify its position as a flagship.
Performance
Both devices utilize a 3nm process, but their CPU architectures differ significantly. The iPhone 16’s Apple A18 features a hexa-core configuration (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.20 GHz), prioritizing high single-core performance. The vivo X200 Pro mini’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400 employs an octa-core setup (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720), potentially offering superior multi-core performance. The Cortex-X925 is Mediatek’s latest and greatest core, aiming to challenge Apple’s custom designs. Thermal management will be crucial; the Dimensity 9400’s higher core count could lead to more heat generation under sustained load, potentially impacting sustained performance. Both are expected to ship with LPDDR5x RAM, but the speed and configuration will influence real-world responsiveness.
Battery Life
The iPhone 16 offers a commendable 37-hour endurance and 15:42 hours of active use, backed by a 1000-cycle battery lifespan. The X200 Pro mini’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 90W wired charging is a significant advantage, potentially fully charging the device in under 40 minutes. The iPhone 16 supports 50% charge in 30 minutes with PD2.0, 25W MagSafe wireless charging, and 15W Qi2 wireless charging. While the iPhone’s wireless charging options are convenient, the X200 Pro mini’s 90W wired charging offers a far quicker top-up. The 4.5W reverse wired charging on the iPhone is a niche feature, while the X200 Pro mini also offers reverse wired charging, though the wattage is unspecified.
Buying Guide
Buy the Apple iPhone 16 if you need seamless integration with the Apple ecosystem, guaranteed software updates for years to come, and a consistently optimized user experience. Buy the vivo X200 Pro mini if you prioritize charging speed, potentially higher raw performance for demanding tasks, and are comfortable with a less established software ecosystem.