iPhone 16 Plus vs Xiaomi 15 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?

Apple’s iPhone 16 Plus and Xiaomi’s 15 Pro represent the pinnacle of smartphone engineering from their respective ecosystems. This comparison isn’t simply about brand loyalty; it’s a head-to-head battle of silicon, display technology, and charging innovation, targeting users who demand the best in mobile performance and features.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing ecosystem integration and long-term software support, the iPhone 16 Plus remains a strong choice. However, the Xiaomi 15 Pro delivers a compelling package with significantly faster charging – 90W wired versus 50% in 30 minutes for the iPhone – and a potentially more powerful CPU, making it the winner for power users and gamers.

PHONES
Phone Names Apple iPhone 16 Plus Xiaomi 15 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 53, 66 - A32901, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - China
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 53, 66, 70, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A32901, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA - China
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5G, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 MbpsHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, September 092024, October 29
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, September 20Available. Released 2024, October 29
Body
BuildGlass front (Ceramic Shield), glass back, aluminum frame-
Dimensions160.9 x 77.8 x 7.8 mm (6.33 x 3.06 x 0.31 in)161.3 x 75.3 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm
SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time; International)· eSIM + eSIM (8 or more, max 2 at a time; USA)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (China)Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight199 g (7.02 oz)213 g or 219 g (7.51 oz)
Display
ProtectionCeramic Shield glass (2024 gen), Mohs level 4Shatterproof glass (2024 gen)
Resolution1290 x 2796 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density)1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density)
Size6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper Retina XDR OLED, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (typ), 2000 nits (HBM)LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3200 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUHexa-core (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.20 GHz)Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M)
ChipsetApple A18 (3 nm)Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)
GPUApple GPU (5-core graphics)Adreno 830
OSiOS 18, upgradable to iOS 26.1Android 15, HyperOS 2
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual48 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF-
FeaturesDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama)Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Triple-50 MP, f/1.4, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF
Video4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), stereo sound rec.8K@24/30fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, Dolby Vision HDR, 3D (spatial) audio, stereo sound rec.HDR, panorama
Single12 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor)32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 0.7µm
Video4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, DisplayPortUSB Type-C 3.2 Gen2, Display Port, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, hotspotWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band or tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFace ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
Battery
ChargingWired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min 25W wireless (MagSafe), 15W wireless (China only) 15W wireless (Qi2) 4.5W reverse wired90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+ 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
TypeLi-Ion 4674 mAhSi/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, White, Pink, Teal, UltramarineBlack, White, Silver, Green
ModelsA3290, A3082, A3289, A3291, iPhone17,424101PNB7C, 2410DPN6CC
Price€ 700.00 / $ 498.74 / £ 599.99 / ₹ 76,490About 690 EUR
SAR1.13 W/kg (head)     1.16 W/kg (body)-
SAR EU1.24 W/kg (head)     1.33 W/kg (body)-
EU LABEL
Battery48:00h endurance, 1000 cycles-
EnergyClass B-
Free fallClass C (90 falls)-
RepairabilityClass C-

Apple iPhone 16 Plus

  • Excellent long-term battery health (1000 cycles)
  • Seamless Apple ecosystem integration
  • High peak display brightness (1823 nits)

  • Slower charging speeds compared to Xiaomi
  • Less customization options in iOS
  • Potentially lower multi-threaded performance

Xiaomi 15 Pro

  • Significantly faster 90W wired charging
  • Potentially higher CPU performance with octa-core design
  • More open and customizable Android OS

  • Battery health longevity is unknown
  • Software updates may be less consistent than Apple
  • Ecosystem lock-in is less strong

Display Comparison

The iPhone 16 Plus boasts a peak brightness of 1823 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While Xiaomi doesn’t provide this metric, their flagship displays typically excel in color accuracy. Both devices likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery life. The iPhone’s display benefits from Apple’s color calibration, while Xiaomi often focuses on maximizing screen-to-body ratio. The difference will likely be subtle, but the iPhone’s measured brightness gives it a slight edge for outdoor use.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Xiaomi flagships typically prioritize high megapixel counts and large sensors. The iPhone traditionally excels in computational photography and video recording. The image processing philosophies differ significantly; Apple aims for natural-looking images, while Xiaomi often boosts saturation and contrast. The absence of a telephoto lens specification for either phone makes it hard to assess zoom capabilities. The focus should be on the main sensor size and aperture, as these directly impact low-light performance.

Performance

Both the Apple A18 (3nm) and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) are built on cutting-edge 3nm processes, promising significant efficiency gains. However, the Snapdragon 8 Elite features an octa-core configuration (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) compared to the iPhone’s hexa-core (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.20 GHz). This core count advantage *could* translate to better multi-threaded performance for tasks like video editing and 3D rendering. The Oryon V2 cores are also designed for high single-core performance, potentially surpassing the A18 in specific benchmarks. Thermal management will be crucial; the Snapdragon’s higher peak clock speeds may require more aggressive cooling.

Battery Life

The iPhone 16 Plus offers a claimed 48-hour endurance and 18.49 hours of active use, alongside 1000 charge cycles, indicating excellent long-term battery health. The Xiaomi 15 Pro, while lacking endurance figures, compensates with significantly faster charging: 90W wired (PD3.0, QC3+) versus the iPhone’s 50% in 30 minutes. This means the Xiaomi can go from near-empty to full much quicker. The 50W wireless charging on the Xiaomi also surpasses the iPhone’s 25W MagSafe and 15W Qi2 options. The iPhone’s 4.5W reverse wired charging is a niche feature, while the Xiaomi offers 10W reverse wireless.

Buying Guide

Buy the Apple iPhone 16 Plus if you need seamless integration with other Apple devices, prioritize a mature and reliable software experience with guaranteed updates, and value the MagSafe ecosystem. Buy the Xiaomi 15 Pro if you prefer faster charging speeds, a potentially more powerful CPU for demanding tasks, and a more open Android operating system with greater customization options.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Elite in the Xiaomi 15 Pro tend to throttle under sustained load, and how does its cooling system compare to the iPhone 16 Plus?
The Snapdragon 8 Elite's higher peak clock speeds mean it *could* be more prone to thermal throttling. Xiaomi typically employs advanced cooling solutions like vapor chambers, but real-world performance will depend on the specific implementation. The iPhone 16 Plus, with its A18 chip, is known for efficient thermal management, but may sacrifice peak performance to maintain consistent temperatures.
❓ How does MagSafe on the iPhone 16 Plus compare to the wireless charging capabilities of the Xiaomi 15 Pro in terms of convenience and ecosystem benefits?
MagSafe offers a unique magnetic attachment system for accessories like wallets and chargers, providing a secure connection and potentially faster wireless charging (25W). The Xiaomi 15 Pro’s 50W wireless charging is faster in raw speed, but lacks the accessory ecosystem and magnetic alignment of MagSafe. It's a trade-off between speed and convenience/integration.
❓ What is the impact of the different CPU core configurations (Hexa-core A18 vs. Octa-core Snapdragon 8 Elite) on real-world app performance and multitasking?
The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s octa-core configuration *could* offer an advantage in heavily multi-threaded applications like video editing or 3D rendering. However, Apple’s A-series chips are renowned for their efficient core design and software optimization. In most everyday tasks and gaming, the difference may be negligible. The Oryon V2 cores in the Snapdragon are designed to be very efficient.