iPhone 16 Plus vs. vivo X200 Pro mini: Endurance Meets Velocity
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a seamless ecosystem, the iPhone 16 Plus emerges as the winner. Its 48-hour battery endurance and optimized A18 chip provide a consistently reliable experience. However, power users demanding the fastest charging and potentially higher peak performance will find the vivo X200 Pro mini a compelling alternative.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Apple iPhone 16 Plus | vivo X200 Pro mini |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 53, 66 - A3290 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 53, 66, 70, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A3290 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 09 | 2024, October 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 20 | Available. Released 2024, October 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Ceramic Shield), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 77.8 x 7.8 mm (6.33 x 3.06 x 0.31 in) | 150.8 x 71.8 x 8.2 mm (5.94 x 2.83 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time; International)· eSIM + eSIM (8 or more, max 2 at a time; USA)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (China) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Ceramic Shield glass (2024 gen), Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1290 x 2796 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.31 inches, 98.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super Retina XDR OLED, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (typ), 2000 nits (HBM) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Hexa-core (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.20 GHz) | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Apple A18 (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) |
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core graphics) | Immortalis-G925 |
| OS | iOS 18, upgradable to iOS 26.1 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), stereo sound rec. | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, Dolby Vision HDR, 3D (spatial) audio, stereo sound rec. | HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K, 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, DisplayPort | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min 25W wireless (MagSafe), 15W wireless (China only) 15W wireless (Qi2) 4.5W reverse wired | 90W wired 30W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4674 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Pink, Teal, Ultramarine | Black, White, Green, Pink |
| Models | A3290, A3082, A3289, A3291, iPhone17,4 | V2419A |
| Price | € 700.00 / $ 498.74 / £ 599.99 / ₹ 76,490 | About 610 EUR |
| SAR | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.16 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.24 W/kg (head) 1.33 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 48:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Apple iPhone 16 Plus
- Exceptional 48-hour battery life
- Optimized A18 chip for sustained performance
- Seamless Apple ecosystem integration
- Slower charging speeds compared to vivo
- Less customization options in iOS
vivo X200 Pro mini
- Blazing-fast 90W wired charging
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Dimensity 9400
- More customizable Android experience
- Battery life likely shorter than iPhone 16 Plus
- Software updates may be less consistent than Apple
Display Comparison
The iPhone 16 Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 1823 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the vivo X200 Pro mini’s display specs are currently unknown, vivo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The iPhone’s likely use of LTPO technology allows for variable refresh rates, optimizing battery consumption. The iPhone’s color accuracy is expected to be industry-leading, crucial for content creators. The absence of detailed display specs for the vivo model makes a direct comparison challenging, but it will likely focus on color vibrancy and refresh rate to compete.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera details for the vivo X200 Pro mini, a direct comparison is limited. However, vivo’s flagship models often prioritize camera innovation. The iPhone 16 Plus is expected to continue Apple’s tradition of computational photography excellence, focusing on natural-looking images and reliable video recording. The Dimensity 9400’s ISP capabilities will be crucial for the vivo’s image processing. The iPhone’s advantage lies in its established video recording capabilities and consistent image quality across all lenses. The vivo will need to demonstrate a significant advantage in sensor size or image processing to compete effectively.
Performance
Both devices leverage a 3nm process, but their architectures differ significantly. The iPhone 16 Plus’s Apple A18 features a hexa-core CPU (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.20 GHz), optimized for efficiency and sustained performance. The vivo X200 Pro mini’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400 employs an octa-core configuration (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720). The Dimensity 9400’s Cortex-X925 core promises higher peak performance, potentially exceeding the A18 in raw CPU benchmarks. However, Apple’s tight software integration and thermal management typically result in more consistent performance under sustained load. The iPhone’s LPDDR5X RAM, coupled with the A18’s Neural Engine, will likely provide a smoother experience in AI-driven tasks.
Battery Life
The iPhone 16 Plus’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 48 hours. This is complemented by 1000 charge cycles, indicating long-term battery health. The active use score of 18:49h further reinforces its longevity. The vivo X200 Pro mini compensates with its incredibly fast 90W wired charging, capable of significantly reducing downtime. While the iPhone offers 25W wireless charging (MagSafe) and 15W Qi2, the vivo’s 30W wireless charging is also competitive. The iPhone’s slower charging speed is a trade-off for its superior battery life, while the vivo prioritizes quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Apple iPhone 16 Plus if you need exceptional battery life, a mature and polished software experience, and seamless integration with the Apple ecosystem. It’s ideal for users who value reliability and long-term support. Buy the vivo X200 Pro mini if you prioritize blazing-fast 90W charging, potentially higher CPU performance for demanding tasks, and a more aggressive, feature-packed Android experience.