Apple iPad Pro 13 (2025) vs OnePlus Pad Pro: A Head-to-Head Tablet Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing long-term reliability and sustained performance, the Apple iPad Pro 13 (2025) is the clear winner. Its M5 chip and exceptional 76-hour battery endurance outweigh the OnePlus Pad Pro’s faster charging, making it ideal for professionals and power users. However, the OnePlus Pad Pro offers compelling value for Android enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Apple iPad Pro 13 (2025) | OnePlus Pad Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - cellular model only | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - cellular model only | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - A3361 - cellular model only | N/A |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A3361, A3362 - cellular model only | - |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 16 | 2024, June 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 22 | Available. Released 2024, June 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 281.6 x 215.5 x 5.1 mm (11.09 x 8.48 x 0.20 in) | 268.7 x 195.1 x 6.5 mm (10.58 x 7.68 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | eSIM - cellular model only | No |
| Weight | 579 g (Wi-Fi), 582 g (5G) (1.28 lb) | 584 g (1.29 lb) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 2064 x 2752 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~265 ppi density) | 2120 x 3000 pixels (~304 ppi density) |
| Size | 13.0 inches, 523.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.1 inches, 445.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Ultra Retina Tandem OLED, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 144Hz, 600 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 9-core (3 performance cores, 6 efficiency cores) - 256/512GB models10-core (4 performance cores, 6 efficiency cores) - 1/2TB models | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Apple M5 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Apple GPU (10-core graphics) | Adreno 750 |
| OS | iPadOS 26, upgradable to iPadOS 26.1 | Android 14, OxygenOS 14.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 2TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED dual-tone flash, HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), dual pixel PDAF TOF 3D LiDAR scanner (depth) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, ProRes (4K, 1080p) | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30ps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Face detection, HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.0, 122˚ (ultrawide) | 8 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@25/30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, EDR | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| NFC | No | NFC (data sharing only) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS (Wi‑Fi + Cellular model only) | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 4 (Thunderbolt 3), DisplayPort, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 50% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD, QC |
| Type | Li-Po 10290 mAh | Li-Po 9510 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver, Space Black | Gray, Green |
| Models | A3360, A3361, A3362 | OPD2404 |
| Price | About 1450 EUR | About 370 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 76:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class G | - |
| Free fall | Class E (40 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Apple iPad Pro 13 (2025)
- Exceptional 76-hour battery life
- Powerful Apple M5 chip for demanding tasks
- Tight integration with the Apple ecosystem
- Potentially higher price point
- Limited customization compared to Android
OnePlus Pad Pro
- 67W fast charging for quick power-ups
- Android’s open ecosystem and customization options
- Potentially more affordable price
- Battery life likely shorter than the iPad Pro
- Performance may lag behind the M5 in sustained workloads
Display Comparison
While display specifications are missing for the OnePlus Pad Pro, the iPad Pro 13 (2025) is expected to continue utilizing a Liquid Retina XDR display with ProMotion technology. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP supports high-resolution displays, suggesting the OnePlus Pad Pro will also feature a high-quality panel. However, Apple’s LTPO technology dynamically adjusts refresh rates up to 120Hz, optimizing battery life, a feature not confirmed for the OnePlus Pad Pro. The iPad Pro’s color accuracy, historically excellent, will likely remain a key differentiator for creative professionals.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent for both devices. Given the tablet form factor, camera quality is less critical than on smartphones. However, Apple typically prioritizes image processing and video recording capabilities. The OnePlus Pad Pro, leveraging the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP, will likely offer competitive image quality, but may lean towards a more vibrant, saturated look. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance or optical image stabilization (OIS) capabilities.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. Apple’s M5, available in 9-core (256/512GB) and 10-core (1/2TB) configurations, is a system-on-a-chip (SoC) designed for tight hardware-software integration. This contrasts with the OnePlus Pad Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 employs an octa-core architecture (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520), offering strong multi-core performance. However, Apple’s M5 typically demonstrates superior single-core performance and efficiency, crucial for responsiveness and sustained workloads. The iPad Pro’s LPDDR5X RAM further enhances memory bandwidth, potentially exceeding the OnePlus Pad Pro’s expected RAM configuration.
Battery Life
The Apple iPad Pro 13 (2025) boasts an impressive 76-hour battery endurance and a 1000-cycle lifespan, indicating exceptional longevity. This is a significant advantage for users who rely on their tablets for extended periods. The OnePlus Pad Pro compensates with 67W wired charging, supporting PD and QC standards, allowing for a 0-100% charge in a significantly shorter timeframe. While the exact battery capacity of the OnePlus Pad Pro is unknown, the faster charging speed suggests a focus on quick top-ups rather than extended runtime. The iPad Pro’s 30-minute 50% charge is respectable, but doesn’t match the OnePlus Pad Pro’s speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Apple iPad Pro 13 (2025) if you need a tablet deeply integrated into the Apple ecosystem, demand industry-leading performance for demanding tasks like video editing and graphic design, and value exceptional battery life for all-day productivity. Buy the OnePlus Pad Pro if you prefer the flexibility of Android, prioritize fast charging and gaming performance, and seek a more affordable high-end tablet experience.