Apple's latest iPad Pro 13 (2024) introduces the groundbreaking M4 chip, promising a leap in mobile performance. However, Xiaomi's Pad 7 Pro, powered by the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, offers a compelling alternative with its focus on fast charging and a potentially more accessible price point. This comparison dissects the core differences to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For professional creatives and users demanding sustained peak performance, the Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024) is the clear winner, thanks to the M4 chip and exceptional 77-hour battery endurance. However, the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro provides excellent value and a rapid charging experience, making it ideal for everyday users and gamers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - A2926 | - |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 - A2926, A3007 | - |
| EDGE | - | N/A |
| GPRS | - | N/A |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 07 | 2024, October 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 15 | Available. Released 2024, October 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 281.6 x 215.5 x 5.1 mm (11.09 x 8.48 x 0.20 in) | 251.2 x 173.4 x 6.2 mm (9.89 x 6.83 x 0.24 in) |
| SIM | eSIM | No |
| Weight | 579 g (Wi-Fi), 582 g (5G) (1.28 lb) | 500 g (1.10 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 2064 x 2752 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 2136 x 3200 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~345 ppi density) |
| Size | 13.0 inches, 527.3 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.2 inches, 371.5 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Ultra Retina Tandem OLED, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 9-core 4.4 GHz (3 performance cores, 6 efficiency cores) - 256/512GB models10-core 4.4 GHz (4 performance cores, 6 efficiency cores) - 1/2TB models | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Apple M4 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Apple GPU (10-core graphics) | Adreno 735 |
| OS | iPadOS 17.5.1, upgradable to iPadOS 26.1 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 2TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Quad-LED dual-tone flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), dual pixel PDAF
TOF 3D LiDAR scanner (depth) | - |
| Video | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, ProRes (4K, 1080p) | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Face detection, HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.4, 122˚ (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 0.61µm |
| Video | 1080p@25/30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, EDR | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS (Wi‑Fi + Cellular model only) | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 4 (Thunderbolt 3), DisplayPort, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 40% in 20 min |
| Type | Li-Po 10290 mAh | 8850 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver, Space Black | Gray, Blue, Green |
| Models | A2925, A2926, A3007, iPad16,5, iPad16,6 | 24091RPADG |
| Price | About 1550 EUR | About 500 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 77:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class G | - |
| Free fall | Class E (0 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024)
- Exceptional M4 chip performance
- Industry-leading 77-hour battery life
- Potential for a superior display with ProMotion
- Likely higher price point
- Limited charging speed compared to Xiaomi
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
- Fast 67W charging
- Competitive Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 performance
- Potentially more affordable price
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Performance likely lags behind the M4
Display Comparison
While display specifications are missing for the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro, the iPad Pro 13 (2024) is expected to feature an advanced Liquid Retina XDR display with ProMotion technology. The absence of detailed Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro display data makes a direct comparison difficult, but Apple’s LTPO technology dynamically adjusts refresh rates up to 120Hz, optimizing battery life and responsiveness. The iPad Pro’s expected high peak brightness and color accuracy will be crucial for content creators.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent for both devices in the provided data. Given the tablet form factor, camera quality is less critical than on smartphones. However, Apple typically prioritizes image signal processing and computational photography, potentially giving the iPad Pro an edge in image quality. Without specific sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive assessment.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. Apple’s M4, with either a 9-core (256/512GB models) or 10-core (1/2TB models) configuration running at 4.4 GHz, is built on a highly efficient architecture. This contrasts with the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro’s Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm). The M4’s unified memory architecture and dedicated neural engine provide a significant advantage in tasks like machine learning and video processing. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s octa-core CPU (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4, 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) is capable, but likely won’t match the M4’s sustained performance under heavy load. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 will offer good thermal efficiency, but the M4’s architecture is optimized for power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024) boasts an impressive 77-hour endurance, suggesting a substantial battery capacity and efficient power management. This is a significant advantage over the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro’s active use score of 10:12 hours. While the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro compensates with 67W wired charging (PD3.0, QC3+), achieving 40% charge in just 20 minutes, the iPad Pro’s longevity minimizes the need for frequent charging. The difference in endurance suggests a much larger battery capacity on the iPad Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024) if you require uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, or professional-grade photo manipulation, and prioritize all-day battery life. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro if you prioritize a balance of performance and affordability, value fast 67W charging, and primarily use your tablet for media consumption, casual gaming, and everyday productivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the Apple M4 chip compared to the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in real-world tablet tasks?
While synthetic benchmarks will provide specific numbers, the M4’s unified memory architecture and optimized neural engine will likely result in noticeably faster performance in tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and complex multitasking. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is a capable chip, but the M4 is designed for a higher performance ceiling.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro’s 67W charging fully offset the iPad Pro’s significantly longer battery life?
No, while 67W charging is incredibly convenient, allowing for a quick top-up, the iPad Pro’s 77-hour endurance means you’ll likely need to charge it far less frequently. The convenience of fast charging doesn’t negate the benefit of extended battery life.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 sufficient for demanding mobile games on the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro?
Yes, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is a powerful chipset capable of running most mobile games at high settings. However, sustained performance under prolonged gaming sessions may be limited by thermal throttling compared to the iPad Pro’s more efficient M4 chip.
