iPad Air 13 (2025) vs Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Tablet Power and Longevity
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term software support, seamless ecosystem integration, and exceptional battery longevity, the Apple iPad Air 13 (2025) is the superior choice. However, the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro delivers impressive performance and a significantly faster charging experience for those prioritizing speed and value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Apple iPad Air 13 (2025) | Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - A3269 | - |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A3269, A3271 | - |
| EDGE | - | N/A |
| GPRS | - | N/A |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 04 | 2024, October 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 12 | Available. Released 2024, October 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 280.6 x 214.9 x 6.1 mm (11.05 x 8.46 x 0.24 in) | 251.2 x 173.4 x 6.2 mm (9.89 x 6.83 x 0.24 in) |
| SIM | eSIM (cellular model only) | No |
| Weight | 616 g (Wi-Fi) / 617 g (5G) (1.36 lb) | 500 g (1.10 lb) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 2048 x 2732 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 2136 x 3200 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~345 ppi density) |
| Size | 13.0 inches, 519.3 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.2 inches, 371.5 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Liquid Retina IPS LCD, 600 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Apple M3 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Apple GPU (9-core graphics) | Adreno 735 |
| OS | iPadOS 18.3.2, upgradable to iPadOS 26.1 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 1TB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.0, 122˚ (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 0.61µm |
| Video | 1080p@25/30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS (5G model only) | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2, DisplayPort, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (top-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 40% in 20 min |
| Type | Li-Po 9705 mAh (36.59 Wh) | 8850 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Gray, Starlight, Purple, Blue | Gray, Blue, Green |
| Models | A3269, A3271, A3268 | 24091RPADG |
| Price | About 950 EUR | About 500 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.48 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 72:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class G | - |
| Free fall | Class E (0 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Apple iPad Air 13 (2025)
- Exceptional 72-hour battery life
- Long-term software support from Apple
- Optimized performance with the M3 chip
- Likely slower charging speeds
- Potentially higher price point
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
- 67W fast charging (40% in 20 minutes)
- Powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset
- Potentially more affordable price
- Significantly shorter battery life (10:12h)
- Android update support may be limited compared to Apple
Display Comparison
While display specs are missing for the iPad Air 13 (2025), Apple typically employs high-quality, color-accurate panels. The Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro’s display details are also absent, but given its positioning, we can expect a high-resolution LCD or OLED panel. The key differentiator will likely be Apple’s potential for ProMotion (adaptive refresh rate) and potentially higher peak brightness, contributing to better outdoor visibility. The absence of LTPO information for both devices makes it difficult to assess power efficiency gains from variable refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent for both tablets, which is typical for this category. However, given Apple’s history, the iPad Air 13 (2025) will likely feature a capable rear camera for document scanning and casual photography. Xiaomi often emphasizes camera specs, so the Pad 7 Pro might offer a slightly more feature-rich camera system, but neither is likely to compete with dedicated smartphone cameras. The absence of information prevents a meaningful comparison of sensor sizes, OIS, or lens apertures.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. Apple’s M3, an octa-core CPU, is renowned for its efficiency and optimized software integration. The Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro counters with the Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, also an octa-core CPU, built on a 4nm process. The Snapdragon’s architecture – 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4, 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520 – suggests a focus on peak performance, while the M3 likely prioritizes sustained performance and power efficiency. The M3’s unified memory architecture also gives it an edge in graphics-intensive tasks. The lack of RAM specifications for both devices makes a direct comparison difficult, but Apple typically employs faster LPDDR5X RAM.
Battery Life
Battery life is a significant differentiator. The iPad Air 13 (2025) boasts an impressive 72-hour endurance and a 1000-cycle lifespan, indicating exceptional longevity and battery health retention. The Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro, with a 10:12 hour active use score, falls considerably short in endurance. However, Xiaomi compensates with 67W wired charging, achieving 40% charge in just 20 minutes, utilizing PD3.0 and QC3+ standards. This rapid charging is a major advantage for users who need a quick power boost, while the iPad Air likely relies on slower charging speeds, prioritizing battery health over speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Apple iPad Air 13 (2025) if you need a tablet deeply integrated with the Apple ecosystem, value long-term software updates, and require all-day battery life for productivity and creative tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro if you prefer a more open Android experience, prioritize fast charging and raw performance for gaming, and are looking for a feature-rich tablet at a potentially lower price point.