Apple iPad (2025) vs Google Pixel Tablet: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing long-term reliability and sustained performance, the Apple iPad (2025) is the clear winner. Its A16 Bionic chip and exceptional 67-hour battery endurance outweigh the Pixel Tablet’s more flexible software and lower charging speed. However, the Pixel Tablet offers a compelling value proposition for those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Apple iPad (2025) | Google Pixel Tablet |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - A3355 | N/A |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A3355, A3356 | - |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 04 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 12 | Available. Released 2023, June 20 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 248.6 x 179.5 x 7 mm (9.79 x 7.07 x 0.28 in) | 258 x 169 x 8.1 mm (10.16 x 6.65 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | eSIM (cellular model only) | No |
| Weight | 477 g (Wi-Fi) / 481 g (LTE) (1.05 lb) | 493 g (1.09 lb) |
| - | Stylus support | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1640 x 2360 pixels (~264 ppi density) | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~276 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 357.6 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.95 inches, 347.7 cm2 (~79.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Liquid Retina IPS LCD, 500 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 5-core | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core graphics) | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | iPadOS 18.3.2, upgradable to iPadOS 26.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 512GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.4, 122˚ (ultrawide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@25/30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, EDR, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS (Wi‑Fi + Cellular model only) | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, DisplayPort; magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.2 (Gen 1), magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (top-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po (28.93 Wh) | Li-Po 7020 mAh (27 Wh) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver, Blue, Pink, Yellow | Porcelain, Hazel, Rose |
| Models | A3355, A3356, A3354 | GA06156-EU, GA06157-EU, GA06158-EU |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 670 EUR |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.47 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 67:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class G | - |
| Free fall | Class E (0 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Apple iPad (2025)
- Exceptional 67-hour battery endurance
- Powerful A16 Bionic chip for demanding tasks
- Faster 45W wired charging with PD
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Potentially higher price point
- Less integrated smart home features compared to Pixel Tablet
Google Pixel Tablet
- Seamless integration with Google ecosystem
- More affordable price point
- Versatile smart home hub functionality
- Octa-core Tensor G2 processor
- Slower 15W wired charging
- Likely lower sustained performance compared to A16 Bionic
Display Comparison
The Apple iPad (2025) boasts a 466 nit max brightness, providing a visibly brighter image than we anticipate from the Pixel Tablet (based on Google’s historical display choices). While neither device is confirmed to have LTPO technology, the iPad’s brightness advantage will be noticeable in outdoor environments. The lack of detailed display specs for the Pixel Tablet suggests a focus on cost optimization rather than pushing display boundaries. Color accuracy is likely to be excellent on both, given Apple and Google’s reputations, but the iPad’s higher peak brightness provides a tangible advantage for HDR content.
Camera Comparison
Given the tablet form factor, camera performance isn’t a primary concern. However, the absence of detailed camera specs for the Pixel Tablet suggests a similar approach to previous models – functional but not exceptional. The iPad (2025) is likely to feature a capable camera system, but Apple rarely emphasizes camera advancements in its iPad lineup. Without specific sensor details for either device, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison, but we expect the iPad to offer slightly better image quality due to Apple’s image signal processing expertise.
Performance
The core difference lies in the silicon. Apple’s A16 Bionic, fabricated on a 4nm process, is a proven performer, offering a 5-core CPU designed for efficiency and responsiveness. In contrast, the Google Pixel Tablet utilizes the Tensor G2 (5nm). While the Tensor G2’s octa-core configuration (with Cortex-X1 and A78 cores) sounds impressive on paper, the A16 Bionic’s architectural advantages and tighter software integration typically translate to superior real-world performance, especially in sustained workloads. The 5nm process of the Tensor G2 is larger than the A16’s 4nm, potentially leading to higher power consumption and thermal throttling under heavy load. The iPad’s performance edge will be most apparent in demanding applications like video editing and 3D rendering.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the iPad (2025) truly shines. Its 67-hour endurance and 9:26-hour active use score are exceptional, indicating a highly optimized power management system. The Pixel Tablet, with its 15W wired charging, will likely offer significantly slower charging speeds. While the Pixel Tablet’s battery capacity is unknown, the iPad’s longevity is bolstered by its 1000-cycle battery lifespan, promising years of reliable use. The iPad’s 45W wired charging with PD support also provides faster replenishment when needed, mitigating the impact of its larger battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Apple iPad (2025) if you need a consistently powerful tablet for demanding tasks like video editing, graphic design, or gaming, and value exceptional battery life for all-day use. Buy the Google Pixel Tablet if you prioritize a seamless smart home experience, enjoy Google’s software features, and prefer a more affordable tablet for casual use and media consumption.