iPad (2022) vs. Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2: A Detailed Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and long-term software support, the Apple iPad (2022) is the clear winner. Its A14 Bionic chip delivers significantly faster processing speeds, making it ideal for demanding apps and games. However, the Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2 offers a compelling value proposition for casual users seeking a capable tablet at a lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Apple iPad (2022) | Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - A2757 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - A2757 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A2757, A2777 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - A2777 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 18 | 2022, September 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 26 | Available. Released 2023, January |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 248.6 x 179.5 x 7 mm (9.79 x 7.07 x 0.28 in) | 269.1 x 169.4 x 7.4 mm (10.59 x 6.67 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM (cellular model only) | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 477 g (Wi-Fi) / 481 g (LTE) (1.05 lb) | 520 g (1.15 lb) |
| Stylus support (1st gen only) | Stylus support | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating | - |
| Resolution | 1640 x 2360 pixels (~264 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~203 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.9 inches, 359.2 cm2 (~80.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.5 inches, 376.4 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Liquid Retina IPS LCD, 500 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Hexa-core (2x3.0 GHz Firestorm + 4x1.8 GHz Icestorm) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core graphics) | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | iPadOS 16.1, upgradable to iPadOS 26.1 | Android 12L |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), AF |
| Video | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.4, 122˚ (ultrawide) | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@25/30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, EDR, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS (Wi‑Fi + Cellular model only) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, DisplayPort; magnetic connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (top-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | Li-Po 7606 mAh (28.6 Wh) | Li-Po 7700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver, Blue, Pink, Yellow | Storm Grey, Sage |
| Models | A3162, A2757, A2777, A2696, iPad13,18, iPad13,19 | TB350FU |
| Price | About 430 EUR | About 350 EUR |
Apple iPad (2022)
- Significantly faster processor (A14 Bionic)
- Superior software support and ecosystem integration
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Higher price point
- Limited storage options at base price
Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2
- More affordable price
- Good battery efficiency with Helio G99
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Slower processor compared to A14 Bionic
- Less frequent software updates
- Potentially lower build quality
Display Comparison
While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) aren't provided, the core difference lies in the underlying processing power impacting display responsiveness. The A14 Bionic’s image signal processor (ISP) likely contributes to more accurate color reproduction and faster processing of displayed content. The 6nm Helio G99, while efficient, may exhibit slightly more latency in complex visual scenarios. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segments, but the A14's superior GPU will render graphics more smoothly.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, Apple typically prioritizes image processing and computational photography, leveraging the A14’s Neural Engine for features like Smart HDR. The Helio G99’s ISP is capable, but likely lacks the same level of sophistication. Expect the iPad to deliver more consistent and detailed photos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of detailed camera specs suggests both tablets target casual photography rather than enthusiast-level image capture.
Performance
The Apple A14 Bionic, built on a 5nm process, boasts a hexa-core CPU with two high-performance Firestorm cores clocked at 3.0 GHz and four efficiency cores at 1.8 GHz. This contrasts with the Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2’s MediaTek Helio G99, an octa-core chip with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The A14’s architectural advantage – Apple’s custom cores – and smaller process node translate to significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance. The Helio G99 focuses on efficiency, making it suitable for sustained tasks, but it won’t match the A14’s peak performance. The A14 also benefits from faster RAM (likely LPDDR4X vs. the P11 Gen 2's likely LPDDR4), further enhancing responsiveness.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified, but the 6nm Helio G99’s inherent efficiency gives the Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2 a potential advantage in battery life during sustained, less demanding tasks like video playback. However, the A14 Bionic’s efficiency gains and Apple’s software optimization mean the iPad (2022) will likely offer comparable, if not better, real-world battery life with typical usage. Charging wattage is also unknown, but Apple’s ecosystem often prioritizes optimized charging profiles over sheer speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Apple iPad (2022) if you need a tablet capable of handling demanding tasks like video editing, graphic design, or playing graphically intensive games, and if you value Apple’s ecosystem and long-term software updates. Buy the Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2 if you prioritize affordability and primarily use your tablet for media consumption, web browsing, and light productivity tasks, and are comfortable with a less polished software experience.