iPad 10.2 (2019) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019): A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term performance and ecosystem integration, the Apple iPad 10.2 (2019) is the superior choice. While the Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) offers an octa-core processor, the A10 Fusion’s architecture and Apple’s software optimization deliver a smoother, more consistent experience, especially under sustained load.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Apple iPad 10.2 (2019) | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - A2200 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat16 1024/150 Mbps, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - A2198 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 12. Released 2019, September 21 | 2019, February 15. Released 2019, April |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 250.6 x 174.1 x 7.5 mm (9.87 x 6.85 x 0.30 in) | 245.2 x 149.4 x 7.5 mm (9.65 x 5.88 x 0.30 in) |
| Keyboard | QWERTY | - |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 483 g (Wi-Fi) / 493 g (LTE) (1.06 lb) | 469 g (1.03 lb) |
| Stylus support (1st gen only) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating | - |
| Resolution | 1620 x 2160 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.2 inches, 324.6 cm2 (~74.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.34 GHz (2x Hurricane + 2x Zephyr) | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Apple A10 Fusion (16 nm) | Exynos 7904 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR Series7XT Plus (six-core graphics) | Mali-G71 MP2 |
| OS | iOS 13, upgradable to iPadOS 18.7 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Call records | 20 dialed, 20 received, 20 missed calls | - |
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 3000 entries | - |
| - | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.4, 31mm (standard), 1.12µm, AF | 8 MP, f/2.0, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 1.2 MP, f/2.2, 31mm (standard) | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, EDR, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS (Wi‑Fi + Cellular model only) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | Lightning, USB 2.0; magnetic connector | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML | - |
| Games | Downloadable | - |
| Java | Yes | - |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS, Email | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | ANT+ | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 400 h (2G) / Up to 150 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 10 h (multimedia) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 8827 mAh, non-removable (32.9 Wh) | Li-Po 6150 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver, Gold, Space Gray | Black, Gold, Silver |
| Models | A2197, A2200, A2198, iPad7,11, iPad7,12 | SM-T515, SM-T510 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 220 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.92 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.36 W/kg (body) |
Apple iPad 10.2 (2019)
- Superior sustained performance thanks to the A10 Fusion chip.
- Access to Apple’s robust app ecosystem.
- Seamless integration with other Apple devices.
- Limited storage options without cloud reliance.
- No expandable storage via microSD card.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)
- Expandable storage via microSD card.
- More affordable price point.
- Android’s flexible multitasking features.
- Prone to thermal throttling under sustained load.
- Potentially slower app updates and longer software support.
Display Comparison
Both tablets feature 10.1-inch displays, but detailed specifications are missing. Given the market positioning, it’s likely the Galaxy Tab A 10.1 utilizes a TFT LCD panel, while the iPad 10.2 likely employs an IPS LCD. The Exynos 7904’s GPU will likely drive a lower peak brightness than the A10 Fusion’s GPU, impacting outdoor visibility. Bezels are expected to be similar, reflecting the budget nature of both devices. Color accuracy is likely better on the iPad, benefiting from Apple’s display calibration.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Both are equipped with basic camera setups geared towards video calls and casual snapshots. Detailed sensor information is unavailable, but it’s safe to assume both feature relatively low-resolution sensors. Image processing will differ significantly, with Apple prioritizing natural colors and Samsung often boosting saturation. Any secondary cameras (likely 2MP) are unlikely to offer significant utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. Apple’s A10 Fusion, built on a 16nm process, features a quad-core CPU (2x Hurricane + 2x Zephyr). Samsung’s Exynos 7904, fabricated on a more efficient 14nm node, boasts an octa-core configuration (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53). While the Exynos has more cores, the A10 Fusion’s Hurricane cores are significantly more powerful per core. This translates to superior single-core performance for tasks like app launching and web browsing. More importantly, the A10 Fusion’s architecture and Apple’s software optimization provide better sustained performance, mitigating throttling during extended gaming or video editing. The Exynos 7904, while capable, is more prone to thermal throttling under heavy load.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details are missing. However, given the similar form factors, battery life is likely comparable. The Exynos 7904’s 14nm process *should* offer slightly better power efficiency at idle, but the A10 Fusion’s optimized software and potentially more efficient GPU could offset this advantage during active use. Charging wattage is also unknown, but both tablets likely support standard 5W charging, resulting in relatively slow charge times.
Buying Guide
Buy the Apple iPad 10.2 (2019) if you need a tablet that will remain performant for years, value access to Apple’s vast app ecosystem, and appreciate seamless integration with other Apple devices. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) if you prefer the Android operating system, prioritize expandable storage, and are looking for a more affordable option with a potentially more versatile multitasking experience due to Android’s windowing features.