Allview X2 Soul Style + Platinum vs. Allview V2 Viper X+: A Deep Dive Comparison

Allview targets the budget-conscious consumer, and the X2 Soul Style + Platinum and V2 Viper X+ represent two distinct approaches within that segment. The key difference lies in their chipsets: a quad-core Mediatek MT6735 in the X2 Soul Style versus an octa-core MT6753 in the V2 Viper X+. This comparison will dissect those differences and determine which phone delivers the best experience for the price.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Allview V2 Viper X+ is the better choice. While both phones utilize the same 28nm process, the MT6753’s octa-core configuration provides a noticeable performance advantage in multitasking and moderately demanding applications, justifying the likely price difference. The X2 Soul Style remains a viable option for extremely basic use cases.

PHONES
Phone Names Allview X2 Soul Style + Platinum Allview V2 Viper X+
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
3G bandsHSDPA 900 / 2100HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands3, 7, 20, 381, 3, 7, 20, 39, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2015, November. Released 2015, November2015, October. Released 2015, October
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions142.4 x 71.2 x 7 mm (5.61 x 2.80 x 0.28 in)154 x 77 x 7.2 mm (6.06 x 3.03 x 0.28 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Micro-SIMDual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by)
Weight128 g (4.52 oz)155.3 g (5.47 oz)
Display
ProtectionAsahi Dragontrail GlassCorning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density)720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density)
Size5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~68.0% screen-to-body ratio)5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~70.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDAMOLED
Platform
CPUQuad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53Octa-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53
ChipsetMediatek MT6735 (28 nm)Mediatek MT6753 (28 nm)
GPUMali-T720Mali-T720
OSAndroid 5.1 (Lollipop)Android 5.1 (Lollipop)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC
Internal16GB 3GB RAM16GB 3GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDRLED flash, HDR
Single13 MP, f/2.2, AF13 MP, f/2.0, AF
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single5 MP5 MP
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.0, A2DP, EDR4.0, A2DP, EDR
Infrared port-Yes
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.0USB Type-C
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspotWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximityAccelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Stand-byUp to 235 h (3G)Up to 393 h (3G)
Talk timeUp to 7 h 20 min (3G)Up to 13 h 40 min (3G)
TypeLi-Po 2350 mAh, non-removableLi-Po 3150 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsSilverDark blue, Golden pearl
Models-D620
PriceAbout 200 EURAbout 300 EUR
SAR-0.46 W/kg (head)     0.37 W/kg (body)    
SAR EU0.72 W/kg (head)0.69 W/kg (head)

Allview X2 Soul Style + Platinum

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Sufficient for basic tasks
  • Likely longer battery life due to less powerful processor (assuming similar capacity)

  • Slower performance in multitasking
  • Less responsive user interface
  • Limited gaming capabilities

Allview V2 Viper X+

  • Faster and smoother performance
  • Better multitasking capabilities
  • Slightly improved gaming experience

  • Potentially higher price
  • Slightly reduced battery life (assuming similar capacity)
  • May experience more heat under sustained load

Display Comparison

Unfortunately, display specifications are absent from the provided data. However, given the target market, it’s reasonable to assume both devices feature 720p IPS LCD panels. The absence of information regarding brightness, color gamut coverage, or refresh rates suggests neither phone will excel in this area. Users should expect standard viewing experiences, prioritizing functionality over visual fidelity.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. It’s likely both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The absence of information regarding sensor size or aperture suggests neither will perform well in low-light conditions. Any marketing emphasizing megapixel count should be viewed with skepticism, as image quality is more dependent on sensor size and image processing than resolution. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing gimmick, offering minimal practical benefit.

Performance

The core difference between these devices is the chipset. The Allview V2 Viper X+ boasts the Mediatek MT6753, an octa-core processor clocked at 1.3 GHz, utilizing Cortex-A53 cores. This contrasts with the Allview X2 Soul Style + Platinum’s Mediatek MT6735, a quad-core processor also using Cortex-A53 cores at the same clock speed. While both are based on the same architecture, the MT6753’s eight cores allow for more efficient parallel processing. This translates to smoother app switching, faster loading times, and a more responsive UI, particularly when running multiple applications simultaneously. The MT6753 also includes a more capable GPU, offering a slight advantage in mobile gaming, though neither chipset is designed for graphically intensive titles. Both are manufactured on a 28nm process, meaning thermal performance will be similar, but the MT6753 will likely sustain performance for longer under load.

Battery Life

Battery capacity data is missing. However, given the budget nature of these phones and the power consumption of the MT6735 and MT6753, we can expect capacities in the 2000-2500 mAh range. Charging wattage is also unknown. The MT6753, being more powerful, will likely consume slightly more power, potentially offsetting any battery capacity advantage the V2 Viper X+ might have. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but users should anticipate needing to charge both devices daily.

Buying Guide

Buy the Allview X2 Soul Style + Platinum if you prioritize absolute affordability and only need a phone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light web browsing. Its quad-core processor is sufficient for these scenarios. Buy the Allview V2 Viper X+ if you value smoother multitasking, a more responsive user experience, and the ability to handle slightly more demanding apps – even if it means spending a bit more. The octa-core chipset offers a tangible upgrade in everyday usability.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Allview V2 Viper X+ handle popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the octa-core MT6753 chipset in the V2 Viper X+ is more than capable of handling social media apps without significant lag. The increased processing power ensures a smoother scrolling experience and faster loading times compared to the quad-core MT6735 in the X2 Soul Style.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the MT6735 and MT6753 noticeable for everyday tasks?
Yes, the difference is noticeable, especially when multitasking. While both chips can handle single apps, the MT6753’s eight cores allow it to switch between apps more quickly and maintain responsiveness when running multiple applications simultaneously. This results in a more fluid and efficient user experience.
❓ Can either of these phones play modern mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
Both phones *can* run these games, but at low settings and potentially with frame rate drops. The MT6753 in the V2 Viper X+ will offer a slightly better experience, but neither chipset is designed for high-end gaming. Expect compromises in graphical fidelity and performance.
❓ Which phone is better for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls, texts, and WhatsApp?
For basic communication, the Allview X2 Soul Style + Platinum is sufficient. Its quad-core processor can easily handle these tasks without issue. The V2 Viper X+ offers more performance than needed for these use cases, making the X2 Soul Style a more cost-effective option.