Allview targets the budget-conscious consumer, and the Viva Home and V2 Viper X+ represent distinct approaches within that segment. The Viva Home prioritizes basic functionality, while the V2 Viper X+ attempts to offer a more robust performance profile. This comparison dissects the core differences between these two devices, focusing on their chipsets and how those impact real-world usage.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and multitasking, the Allview V2 Viper X+ is the better choice. Its octa-core MT6753 chipset provides a significant performance advantage over the Viva Home’s quad-core MT8163, despite the slightly lower clock speed. However, the Viva Home may suffice for very basic tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 3, 7, 20, 39, 40, 41 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2015, October. Released 2015, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 418.5 x 266.3 x 19.5 mm (16.48 x 10.48 x 0.77 in) | 154 x 77 x 7.2 mm (6.06 x 3.03 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | No | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 2018.3 g (4.45 lb) | 155.3 g (5.47 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~127 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Size | 17.3 inches, 825.1 cm2 (~74.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~70.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8163 | Mediatek MT6753 (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-T720 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 5.1 (Lollipop) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 16GB 3GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| No | - |
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, AF |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP, EDR |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, USB | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 393 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 13 h 40 min (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3150 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Dark blue, Golden pearl |
| Models | - | D620 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 0.37 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) |
Allview Viva Home
- Potentially lower price point
- Simpler user experience
- May be more readily available in certain markets
- Significantly slower performance
- Less capable for multitasking
- Likely inferior camera performance
Allview V2 Viper X+
- Faster and more responsive performance
- Better multitasking capabilities
- Potentially improved camera quality
- May be slightly more expensive
- Potentially shorter battery life (though mitigated by chipset efficiency)
- May be harder to find in some regions
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, display specifications are not provided. However, given the target market, both devices likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The V2 Viper X+’s chipset suggests a potentially higher resolution display to take advantage of the increased processing power. Without knowing the resolution, pixel density, or brightness levels, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the V2 Viper X+ likely offers a sharper, more vibrant visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not detailed. Given the price point, both devices likely feature basic camera setups. The V2 Viper X+’s more powerful chipset could enable slightly better image processing, resulting in improved image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. However, without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or the presence of optical image stabilization (OIS), it’s impossible to make a definitive judgment. It's reasonable to assume the V2 Viper X+ has a more capable camera system due to its processing power.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Allview Viva Home’s Mediatek MT8163 features a quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU, while the V2 Viper X+ boasts the Mediatek MT6753 with an octa-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 configuration. While the individual core clock speed is slightly lower on the V2 Viper X+, the doubling of cores provides a substantial advantage in multi-threaded tasks. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface. The MT6753, built on a 28nm process, also benefits from improved power efficiency compared to the MT8163, potentially leading to better sustained performance under load. The V2 Viper X+ is the clear winner for users who value performance.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the MT6753’s 28nm process node offers better power efficiency than the MT8163. This means the V2 Viper X+ is likely to achieve comparable or even better battery life despite potentially having a similar battery capacity. Charging wattage is also unknown, but the V2 Viper X+’s chipset might support faster charging technologies, further enhancing its usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview Viva Home if you need a simple, affordable device for essential tasks like calls, messaging, and light web browsing. It’s ideal for first-time smartphone users or those needing a secondary device. Buy the Allview V2 Viper X+ if you prefer a smoother experience with more demanding apps, occasional gaming, and improved multitasking capabilities. It’s a better fit for users who want a more versatile smartphone without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Allview V2 Viper X+ handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
While the MT6753 isn't a high-end gaming chipset, it should be capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some occasional stuttering, especially in intense scenes. The Viva Home's MT8163 would likely struggle significantly with this title.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the two phones noticeable for everyday tasks?
Yes, the difference is quite noticeable. The V2 Viper X+'s octa-core processor will make everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and app switching feel much smoother and more responsive compared to the Viva Home's quad-core processor. The extra cores provide a significant advantage in multitasking.
❓ Does the Allview V2 Viper X+ support 4G LTE connectivity?
The Mediatek MT6753 chipset inherently supports 4G LTE connectivity. Therefore, the Allview V2 Viper X+ should be capable of connecting to 4G networks, providing faster data speeds where available. The Viva Home's MT8163 may or may not support 4G, depending on the specific implementation.
