The Allview Viva Home and P9 Energy Lite (2017) represent Allview's attempts to capture the budget smartphone market. While both aim for affordability, they diverge significantly in their core hardware. The Viva Home prioritizes a newer, albeit less powerful, chipset, while the P9 Energy Lite opts for an older, octa-core processor. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing multitasking and responsiveness, the Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) is the better choice. Its octa-core MT6753 chipset, despite being based on a 28nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Viva Home’s quad-core MT8163, making it more suitable for everyday tasks and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 3, 7, 20, 38 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2017, June. Released 2017, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 418.5 x 266.3 x 19.5 mm (16.48 x 10.48 x 0.77 in) | 148.7 x 72.4 x 9.1 mm (5.85 x 2.85 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 2018.3 g (4.45 lb) | 161 g (5.68 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~127 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 17.3 inches, 825.1 cm2 (~74.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~69.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8163 | Mediatek MT6753 (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-T720 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 7.0 (Nougat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| No | - |
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, USB | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 286 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 16 h |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Gold |
| Price | About 250 EUR | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
Allview Viva Home
- Potentially lower price point due to older chipset.
- Slightly higher individual core clock speed (1.5 GHz).
- May be lighter due to simpler chipset.
- Quad-core processor limits multitasking capabilities.
- MT8163 chipset is less powerful overall.
- Likely to struggle with demanding apps.
Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017)
- Octa-core processor provides smoother performance.
- MT6753 offers better multitasking and app responsiveness.
- Potentially better battery life due to efficient chipset.
- Older chipset technology (28nm process).
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Potentially heavier due to more complex chipset.
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, display specifications are unavailable for either device. However, given their market segment, it's reasonable to assume both utilize IPS LCD panels with 720p resolution. The P9 Energy Lite, being from 2017, may have slightly better color calibration due to more mature manufacturing processes. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both, reflecting the design trends of their respective release periods.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse. It's safe to assume both devices feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the P9 Energy Lite, being a slightly more feature-rich model at launch, *might* have a marginally better camera module, but image quality will likely be similar in most conditions. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors on either device should be considered largely marketing features with limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Allview P9 Energy Lite’s Mediatek MT6753, built on a 28nm process, features an octa-core Cortex-A53 CPU clocked at 1.3 GHz. This configuration provides significantly more parallel processing capability than the Allview Viva Home’s Mediatek MT8163, which has a quad-core Cortex-A53 CPU at 1.5 GHz. While the Viva Home’s cores are individually faster, the P9 Energy Lite’s eight cores will handle multitasking and more demanding applications more efficiently. The 28nm process of the MT6753, while older, doesn't necessarily translate to significantly worse thermal performance given the lower clock speeds and power draw compared to modern high-end chips.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is unknown for both devices. However, the P9 Energy Lite’s name suggests a focus on battery life. The MT6753, while more powerful, is also relatively efficient. Without knowing the battery sizes or charging wattage, it’s difficult to definitively say which device offers better endurance. The P9 Energy Lite’s more efficient octa-core architecture could potentially offset a smaller battery capacity, leading to comparable real-world usage times.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview Viva Home if you need a device for extremely basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light web browsing, and are on the absolute tightest budget. Its MT8163 chipset is sufficient for these limited use cases. Buy the Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience, even with moderate multitasking, and anticipate using apps beyond the most essential. The octa-core processor provides a noticeable performance boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) be able to run modern apps like WhatsApp and Facebook smoothly?
Yes, the MT6753 chipset with its octa-core processor is capable of running apps like WhatsApp and Facebook without significant lag. While it won't offer a flagship-level experience, it provides a usable and responsive experience for these common applications.
❓ Is the Allview Viva Home suitable for playing mobile games?
The Allview Viva Home is only suitable for very basic, less demanding mobile games. The quad-core MT8163 chipset will struggle with most modern titles, resulting in low frame rates and a poor gaming experience. The P9 Energy Lite is a better, though still limited, option for casual gaming.
❓ How does the 28nm process of the MT6753 affect battery life compared to a more modern process?
While a 28nm process is older, the MT6753's lower clock speed and efficient architecture help mitigate the potential power draw. It's unlikely to result in a drastically shorter battery life compared to a device with a newer process, especially considering the unknown battery capacities of both phones.
