Allview targets the value-conscious consumer, and the Viva Home and P8 Energy Pro represent distinct approaches within that segment. The Viva Home prioritizes a streamlined experience with a quad-core processor, while the P8 Energy Pro aims for more robust multitasking with an octa-core chipset. This comparison dissects the core differences to determine which device delivers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and smoother multitasking, the Allview P8 Energy Pro is the better choice. Its octa-core MT6753 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Viva Home’s quad-core MT8163, despite the slightly lower clock speed. However, the Viva Home may suffice for basic tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 3, 7, 38, 39, 40 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2016, February. Released 2016, February |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 418.5 x 266.3 x 19.5 mm (16.48 x 10.48 x 0.77 in) | 160.9 x 81.2 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 3.20 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | No | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 2018.3 g (4.45 lb) | 209.8 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~127 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~367 ppi density) |
| Size | 17.3 inches, 825.1 cm2 (~74.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 99.2 cm2 (~76.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8163 | Mediatek MT6753 (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-T720MP2 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 5.1 (Lollipop) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| No | - |
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, AF |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, USB | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 450 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 22 h 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5020 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Gold/Silver |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 420 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.40 W/kg (head) |
Allview Viva Home
- Potentially lower price point
- Simpler user experience
- Adequate for basic tasks
- Slower performance for multitasking
- Less responsive user interface
- Limited gaming capabilities
Allview P8 Energy Pro
- Octa-core processor for smoother performance
- Better multitasking capabilities
- Potentially better thermal management
- Likely higher price point
- May not offer significant camera improvements
- Battery life dependent on capacity
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, display specifications are unavailable for either device. However, given the price point, we can assume both utilize IPS LCD panels. The P8 Energy Pro, being positioned as a slightly more premium device, *may* feature a higher resolution, but this is speculative. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both, and color accuracy will likely be standard for this market segment. Without specific data, a direct comparison is impossible.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not provided beyond the devices themselves. Given the target market, both are likely to feature basic camera setups. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing capabilities, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It's reasonable to assume the P8 Energy Pro *might* have a slightly more advanced camera system, but this is purely speculative. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device would likely offer minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Allview P8 Energy Pro’s Mediatek MT6753, built on a 28nm process, features an octa-core Cortex-A53 CPU clocked at 1.3 GHz. This contrasts with the Viva Home’s Mediatek MT8163, a quad-core Cortex-A53 processor running at 1.5 GHz. While the Viva Home has a higher clock speed per core, the MT6753’s eight cores provide superior multitasking capabilities. The 28nm process of the MT6753 also suggests potentially better thermal efficiency, allowing sustained performance for longer periods. Users who frequently switch between apps or engage in light gaming will benefit from the P8 Energy Pro’s architecture.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the P8 Energy Pro’s more efficient chipset (MT6753 on 28nm) could translate to longer battery life despite potentially having a similar or even smaller battery capacity compared to the Viva Home. Charging wattage is also unknown, making it difficult to estimate 0-100% charging times. The P8 Energy Pro’s chipset efficiency is the key factor here, potentially offsetting any capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview Viva Home if you need a simple, affordable device primarily for calls, messaging, and light web browsing. Its quad-core processor is adequate for these tasks, and it likely represents the lower price point. Buy the Allview P8 Energy Pro if you prefer a phone capable of handling more demanding applications, multitasking between apps, and offering a more responsive user experience. The octa-core processor provides a significant boost in performance, making it suitable for social media, streaming, and casual gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Allview P8 Energy Pro handle popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram without lag?
Yes, the octa-core MT6753 chipset in the P8 Energy Pro is well-equipped to handle social media applications smoothly. The increased core count and processing power will provide a more responsive experience compared to the quad-core Viva Home, especially when multitasking between apps.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speed (1.5 GHz vs 1.3 GHz) significant between the Viva Home and P8 Energy Pro?
While the Viva Home has a slightly higher clock speed per core, the P8 Energy Pro’s octa-core architecture provides a greater overall performance benefit. The ability to distribute tasks across eight cores outweighs the marginal increase in clock speed, resulting in a smoother and more responsive user experience.
❓ Can the Allview P8 Energy Pro run basic Android games?
The P8 Energy Pro should be capable of running basic Android games, but don't expect high frame rates or graphics settings. The MT6753 chipset is sufficient for casual gaming, but it's not a gaming-focused processor. The Viva Home would struggle with even basic games.
