The Allview Viva C703 and P9 Energy Lite (2017) represent Allview’s attempts to capture the budget smartphone market. Released in different years, they offer distinct approaches to affordability. The Viva C703 prioritizes simplicity, while the P9 Energy Lite aims for more processing power with its Mediatek chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and multitasking, the Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) is the better choice. Its octa-core Mediatek MT6753 processor significantly outperforms the Viva C703’s quad-core Cortex-A7, making it more suitable for modern app usage and light gaming. However, the Viva C703 may appeal to those seeking an extremely basic device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 3, 7, 20, 38 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | No | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2017, June. Released 2017, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 188.5 x 108.3 x 9.7 mm (7.42 x 4.26 x 0.38 in) | 148.7 x 72.4 x 9.1 mm (5.85 x 2.85 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 242 g (8.54 oz) | 161 g (5.68 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 600 x 1024 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~170 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.0 inches, 137.9 cm2 (~67.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~69.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6753 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400MP2 | Mali-T720 |
| OS | Android 8.1 Oreo (Go edition) | Android 7.0 (Nougat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| No | - |
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 2 MP | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 0.3 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 480p | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML | - |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 550 h | Up to 286 h |
| Talk time | Up to 6 h | Up to 16 h |
| Type | Li-Po 2000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Gold |
| Price | About 50 EUR | - |
| SAR EU | 1.30 W/kg (head) 0.80 W/kg (body) | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
Allview Viva C703
- Potentially lower price point
- Simpler user experience
- May be more durable due to simpler design
- Significantly slower performance
- Outdated processor architecture
- Limited multitasking capabilities
Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017)
- Faster and more responsive performance
- Octa-core processor for better multitasking
- More efficient processor for potentially longer battery life
- Likely a higher price than the Viva C703
- May experience more software bloat
- Potentially less durable due to more complex design
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, display specifications for the Allview Viva C703 are unavailable. Given its market positioning, it likely features a basic LCD panel with a modest resolution. The Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) also lacks detailed display information, but its 2017 release suggests a potentially slightly better panel. The key difference isn't likely to be resolution or color accuracy, but rather the processing power to drive more complex display features. Neither device is expected to offer high brightness or advanced features like HDR.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for both devices are scarce. It’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the P9 Energy Lite’s more powerful processor likely enables more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in slightly better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. Any claims of advanced features on either device should be viewed with skepticism.
Performance
The core difference lies in the processors. The Allview Viva C703 utilizes a quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A7, an older architecture focused on power efficiency rather than raw performance. The Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) boasts the Mediatek MT6753, an octa-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 chipset. The Cortex-A53 architecture is significantly more modern and efficient than the A7, and the eight cores provide a substantial advantage in multitasking and handling demanding applications. While the clock speed is slightly lower, the architectural improvements and core count of the MT6753 translate to a noticeably faster and more responsive user experience. The MT6753's 28nm process node also suggests better power management compared to the likely larger node used in the C703.
Battery Life
Battery capacity for both devices is unknown. However, the P9 Energy Lite’s more efficient Mediatek MT6753 chipset likely contributes to better battery life, even if the capacity is similar to the Viva C703. The MT6753’s power management features and optimized core usage will reduce energy consumption during typical usage scenarios. Charging wattage is also unavailable for both devices, suggesting slow charging speeds are likely.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview Viva C703 if you need a truly minimal smartphone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and very light web browsing, and are on an extremely tight budget. Buy the Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) if you prefer a device capable of handling multiple apps simultaneously, streaming video, and offering a smoother overall user experience, even if it means a slightly higher price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) struggle with modern apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
While the Mediatek MT6753 isn't a high-end processor, it's significantly more capable than the Cortex-A7 in the Viva C703. It should handle Facebook, WhatsApp, and similar apps without major issues, though demanding features within those apps might experience some lag. The Viva C703 is likely to struggle significantly with these apps.
❓ Is the Allview Viva C703 suitable for a first-time smartphone user?
The Allview Viva C703's simplicity could make it appealing to a first-time smartphone user who only needs basic functionality. However, its limited performance may lead to frustration if the user attempts to download more demanding apps or multitask. It's best suited for those with very minimal smartphone needs.
❓ Can either of these phones handle basic mobile gaming?
The Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) is the only viable option for even basic mobile gaming. The MT6753 can handle less demanding 2D games and older 3D titles at low settings. The Viva C703's processor is simply too weak for any meaningful gaming experience.
