The Allview Viva C703 and A5 Easy represent Allview's entry into the ultra-budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at a low price point, they differ significantly in their core processing power. This comparison dissects those differences, helping you determine which device offers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Allview Viva C703 is the better choice. Its quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A7 processor provides a noticeable performance advantage over the A5 Easy’s dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7, making it more responsive for everyday tasks and light multitasking. While neither phone is a performance powerhouse, the C703 offers a smoother user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | - |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | No | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2015, August. Released 2015, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 188.5 x 108.3 x 9.7 mm (7.42 x 4.26 x 0.38 in) | 125 x 62.5 x 9.9 mm (4.92 x 2.46 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | No | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 242 g (8.54 oz) | 121 g (4.27 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 600 x 1024 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~170 ppi density) | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.0 inches, 137.9 cm2 (~67.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~58.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT, 256K colors |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A7 | Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6572 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400MP2 | Mali-400 |
| OS | Android 8.1 Oreo (Go edition) | Android 5.1 (Lollipop) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDHC |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 8GB 1GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| No | - |
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 0.3 MP | VGA |
| Video | 480p | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML | - |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 550 h | Up to 200 h |
| Talk time | Up to 6 h | Up to 7 h 40 min |
| Type | Li-Po 2000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 1400 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, White |
| Price | About 50 EUR | - |
| SAR EU | 1.30 W/kg (head) 0.80 W/kg (body) | 1.32 W/kg (head) |
Allview Viva C703
- Faster processor for smoother performance
- Quad-core CPU allows for better multitasking
- More responsive user experience
- Likely less power efficient than the A5 Easy
- Display specifications are unknown
Allview A5 Easy
- More power-efficient chipset (MT6572)
- Potentially longer battery life in standby
- Lower price point (likely)
- Slower dual-core processor
- Less responsive user experience
- Limited multitasking capabilities
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, display specifications are not provided for either device. However, given their market segment, it's reasonable to assume both utilize LCD panels with resolutions around 480x854. The lack of information prevents a detailed comparison of brightness, color accuracy, or viewing angles. The A5 Easy's use of the more efficient 28nm chipset *might* allow for slightly better battery life when displaying the same content, but this is speculative.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not detailed for either device. It's safe to assume both feature basic cameras suitable for casual snapshots. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing capabilities, a meaningful comparison is impossible. The absence of any mention of advanced features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) suggests both cameras will struggle in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the processors. The Allview Viva C703 boasts a quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A7, while the A5 Easy features a dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 based on the Mediatek MT6572 chipset. This translates to a significant performance gap. The additional cores and higher clock speed of the C703 allow it to handle more tasks concurrently and execute processes faster. The MT6572’s 28nm manufacturing process is more efficient than what the C703 likely uses, potentially offering slightly better power efficiency, but the performance difference will be more noticeable in daily use. Users will experience faster app loading times and smoother scrolling on the C703.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Mediatek MT6572 in the A5 Easy, built on a 28nm process, is inherently more power-efficient than the C703’s processor. This could result in slightly longer battery life for the A5 Easy, *despite* the C703’s more powerful processor. Real-world battery life will heavily depend on usage patterns, but the A5 Easy has a potential edge in standby time and light usage scenarios. Charging wattage is also unknown for both devices, making it impossible to compare charging speeds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview Viva C703 if you prioritize responsiveness and a slightly smoother experience when navigating the interface, browsing the web, or using basic apps. It's ideal for users who want a phone that feels less sluggish. Buy the Allview A5 Easy if your primary needs are extremely basic – making calls, sending texts, and very light app usage – and you are looking for the absolute lowest possible price point. It's best suited for first-time smartphone users or as a secondary device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Allview A5 Easy struggle with popular social media apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
The A5 Easy’s dual-core processor and limited RAM may result in slower loading times and occasional lag when using demanding apps like Facebook or WhatsApp. While usable, the experience won't be as smooth as on the Viva C703 or more powerful devices.
❓ Is the Allview Viva C703 suitable for playing mobile games?
The Allview Viva C703 is not designed for serious gaming. While it can handle very basic 2D games, more demanding 3D titles will likely experience significant lag and low frame rates. It's best suited for casual gaming only.
❓ How much storage space do these phones likely have?
Given their budget nature, both phones likely have limited internal storage, probably around 4GB to 8GB. It's highly recommended to utilize the microSD card slot (if available) to expand storage for photos, videos, and apps.
❓ What version of Android do these phones run?
Considering their release timeframe and price point, both devices likely run an older version of Android, potentially Android 4.4 KitKat or Android 5.0 Lollipop. Updates are unlikely to be provided.
