The Allview Viva C703 and A5 Duo represent Allview's approach to the entry-level smartphone market. While both devices utilize the Cortex-A7 architecture, a key difference lies in their core count and clock speed. This comparison dissects these specifications to determine which device delivers superior performance and value for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Allview Viva C703 is the better choice. Its quad-core 1.5 GHz processor provides a noticeable performance advantage over the A5 Duo’s dual-core 1.2 GHz chip, translating to smoother multitasking and faster app loading times, despite both using the same Cortex-A7 architecture.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | - |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | No | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2013, August. Released 2013, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 188.5 x 108.3 x 9.7 mm (7.42 x 4.26 x 0.38 in) | 126 x 64.4 x 11.5 mm (4.96 x 2.54 x 0.45 in) |
| SIM | No | Dual SIM (dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 242 g (8.54 oz) | 137.7 g (4.83 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 600 x 1024 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~170 ppi density) | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.0 inches, 137.9 cm2 (~67.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~56.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A7 | Dual-core 1.2 GHz Cotex-A7 |
| GPU | Mali-400MP2 | Mali-400 |
| OS | Android 8.1 Oreo (Go edition) | Android 4.2.2 (Jelly Bean) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 4GB 512MB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| No | - |
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 2 MP | 3.15 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 0.3 MP | VGA |
| Video | 480p | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML | - |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 550 h | Up to 220 h |
| Talk time | Up to 6 h | Up to 6 h 40 min (2G) / Up to 6 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 2000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 1700 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR EU | 1.30 W/kg (head) 0.80 W/kg (body) | - |
Allview Viva C703
- Faster processor for improved performance
- Better multitasking capabilities
- More responsive user experience
- Potentially slightly lower battery life (depending on usage)
- Likely higher price than the A5 Duo
Allview A5 Duo
- Lower price point
- Potentially longer battery life under light use
- Simpler user experience for basic tasks
- Slower processor and limited performance
- Struggles with multitasking and demanding apps
- Less responsive user interface
Display Comparison
Information regarding display specifications (resolution, panel type, brightness) is unavailable. Given the market segment, both devices likely feature LCD panels with modest resolutions. The absence of data prevents a meaningful comparison in this area; however, it's reasonable to assume both displays are optimized for power efficiency rather than visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not provided. Considering the price point, both devices likely feature basic camera sensors. Without details on megapixel count, aperture, or image processing capabilities, a direct comparison is impossible. It's safe to assume image quality will be adequate for casual snapshots but not competitive with higher-end smartphones.
Performance
The core difference between these devices is the CPU. The Allview Viva C703 boasts a quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A7 processor, while the A5 Duo features a dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7. While both are based on the same ARM architecture, the C703’s increased core count and higher clock speed provide a significant performance boost. This translates to faster application launch times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. The A5 Duo, with its dual-core setup, will likely struggle with demanding tasks or running multiple apps concurrently. The Cortex-A7 is an older architecture, so neither phone will excel at graphically intensive tasks.
Battery Life
Battery capacity and charging wattage are not specified. Given the lower processing power of the A5 Duo, it may exhibit slightly better battery life under light usage scenarios. However, the C703’s faster processor could complete tasks more quickly, potentially offsetting some of the power consumption. Without concrete data, it’s difficult to determine which device offers superior battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview Viva C703 if you prioritize responsiveness and the ability to handle multiple applications simultaneously. This phone is ideal for users who frequently switch between apps, browse the web with multiple tabs open, or enjoy casual gaming. Buy the Allview A5 Duo if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light web browsing – and you are seeking the absolute lowest possible price point, accepting a trade-off in performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Allview Viva C703 handle basic social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the quad-core processor in the Viva C703 should handle social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp without significant lag. The increased processing power compared to the A5 Duo will provide a more fluid experience, especially when switching between apps.
❓ Is the difference in CPU speed between the Viva C703 and A5 Duo noticeable for everyday tasks?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. While both phones can perform basic tasks, the Viva C703’s faster processor will result in quicker app loading times, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall experience. This is particularly evident when multitasking or opening multiple browser tabs.
❓ Can either of these phones play modern mobile games?
Neither phone is well-suited for demanding modern mobile games. The Cortex-A7 architecture is relatively old, and the GPUs in these devices are likely entry-level. While simple 2D games may be playable, expect significant performance limitations and low frame rates in more graphically intensive titles.
