The Allview Viva 1003G and Lenovo Tab 2 A7-10 represent the entry-level of the Android tablet market. Both devices aim to provide basic functionality at an extremely affordable price point. This comparison dissects their similarities and subtle differences to help you determine which tablet best suits your needs, particularly for users prioritizing cost-effectiveness over high-end features.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a basic tablet for media consumption and light tasks, the Allview Viva 1003G edges out the Lenovo Tab 2 A7-10. While both utilize the same Cortex-A7 CPU core, the Allview’s Mediatek MT8321A chipset offers a slight architectural advantage, potentially leading to smoother multitasking.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | - |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, August. Released 2019, August | 2015, January. Released 2015, January |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 246.2 x 171.7 x 10.7 mm (9.69 x 6.76 x 0.42 in) | 189 x 105 x 9.3 mm (7.44 x 4.13 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | No |
| Weight | 479.4 g (1.06 lb) | 269 g (9.49 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 600 x 1024 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~170 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~70.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.0 inches, 137.9 cm2 (~69.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8321A (28 nm) | Mediatek MT8127 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400 | Mali-450MP4 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 4.4 (KitKat), upgradable to 5.0 (Lollipop) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 8GB 1GB RAM, 16GB 1GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 2 MP | VGA |
| Video | 720p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | - |
| | - | No |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Stand-by | Up to 400 h | Up to 432 h |
| Talk time | Up to 11 h | Up to 8 h (multimedia) |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3450 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | - | About 90 EUR |
| SAR EU | 1.05 W/kg (body) | - |
Allview Viva 1003G
- Slightly more powerful chipset (MT8321A)
- Potentially smoother multitasking
- Competitive price point
- Limited brand recognition
- Likely minimal software updates
Lenovo Tab 2 A7-10
- Established brand (Lenovo)
- Potentially better software support
- Wider availability
- Less powerful chipset (MT8127)
- Slightly slower performance
- Similar price to Allview
Display Comparison
Neither Allview nor Lenovo provide display specifications beyond screen size. Given the target market, both likely employ IPS LCD panels with resolutions around 1024x600. The absence of details like peak brightness or color gamut suggests neither tablet is designed for color-critical work or outdoor use. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor. The viewing experience will be adequate for basic tasks but not exceptional.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Both devices likely feature basic cameras suitable for occasional snapshots. Without specific sensor details, it's safe to assume image quality will be limited, especially in low-light conditions. Focusing on camera specs would be a misdirection given the target audience and price point.
Performance
Both tablets are powered by quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 CPUs, but the underlying chipsets differ. The Allview Viva 1003G utilizes the Mediatek MT8321A, fabricated on a 28nm process, while the Lenovo Tab 2 A7-10 uses the Mediatek MT8127, also on 28nm. While the core architecture is identical, the MT8321A often features slightly improved GPU performance and memory controller efficiency. This translates to potentially smoother scrolling and faster app loading times on the Allview, though the difference will be subtle in everyday use. Both are limited by the Cortex-A7 architecture, making them unsuitable for demanding games or heavy multitasking.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given their similar chipsets and screen sizes, battery life is expected to be comparable – roughly 4-6 hours of moderate use. Both tablets support 10W wired charging, indicating similar charging speeds. Users should not expect fast charging capabilities; a full charge will likely take several hours.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview Viva 1003G if you need a tablet for occasional web browsing, video streaming, and simple games, and value a marginally faster processor for the price. Buy the Lenovo Tab 2 A7-10 if you prioritize brand recognition and potentially better software support, accepting a slightly less performant chipset for the same price bracket. Both are ideal for users new to tablets or needing a secondary device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will either of these tablets handle popular games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
No. The Cortex-A7 CPU and limited GPU capabilities of both the MT8321A and MT8127 chipsets are insufficient for running demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty at playable frame rates. These tablets are best suited for casual games and media consumption.
❓ How well will these tablets perform with multiple apps open simultaneously?
Multitasking will be limited. While the Allview Viva 1003G has a slight chipset advantage, both tablets have only 1GB of RAM (assumed based on chipset and market segment). Expect slowdowns and app reloading when switching between more than a few apps.
❓ Are these tablets suitable for video conferencing?
They are adequate for basic video conferencing. The built-in cameras are likely low resolution, and the microphones may not offer exceptional clarity. However, for short video calls with good lighting, they should suffice.
