Allview targets the ultra-budget tablet market with the Viva 1003G Lite and H7S. Both devices utilize MediaTek chipsets, but a closer look reveals a key difference in processing power. This comparison dissects the nuances between the MT8321A in the 1003G Lite and the MT8382 in the H7S, helping you determine which tablet delivers the best experience for everyday tasks.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing slightly smoother multitasking and potentially better app compatibility, the Allview Viva H7S is the better choice. While both tablets are geared towards basic usage, the MT8382 chipset offers a marginal performance advantage over the MT8321A, making it worth the potential price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2014, June. Released 2014, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 246.2 x 171.7 x 10.7 mm (9.69 x 6.76 x 0.42 in) | 191 x 107.3 x 8.8 mm (7.52 x 4.22 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 505.2 g (1.11 lb) | 277.6 g (9.81 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~216 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~70.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.0 inches, 142.1 cm2 (~69.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8321A (28 nm) | Mediatek MT8382 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400 | Mali-400MP2 |
| OS | Android 8.1 Oreo (Go edition) | Android 4.2.2 (Jelly Bean) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM | 8GB 1GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 0.3 MP | 5 MP, AF |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | VGA |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, EDR |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Stand-by | Up to 400 h | Up to 300 h |
| Talk time | Up to 8 h 20 min | Up to 5 h |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 100 EUR | - |
| SAR EU | 1.05 W/kg (body) | - |
Allview Viva 1003G Lite
- Potentially lower price point
- Slightly longer battery life in very light usage scenarios
- Compact and portable design
- Less powerful chipset (MT8321A)
- Potentially slower app loading times
- Limited multitasking capabilities
Allview Viva H7S
- More capable chipset (MT8382)
- Slightly smoother user experience
- Better graphics performance for light gaming
- Potentially higher price
- Slightly reduced battery life under load
- Still limited by budget components
Display Comparison
Neither Allview provides detailed display specifications. Given the price point, both tablets likely utilize IPS LCD panels with similar resolutions (likely 1024x600 or similar). The absence of information regarding brightness, color gamut coverage, or viewing angles suggests a focus on cost reduction. Expect basic visual performance suitable for indoor use. Bezels are likely substantial on both models, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Allview typically equips its budget devices with basic camera sensors. Without specific megapixel counts or aperture information, it's safe to assume both tablets offer adequate image quality for casual snapshots in good lighting conditions. Expect limited low-light performance and a lack of advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS). Any 2MP or lower resolution cameras are likely present for marketing purposes only and will deliver minimal usable image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Allview Viva H7S boasts the Mediatek MT8382, while the 1003G Lite uses the MT8321A. Both are quad-core Cortex-A7 processors clocked at 1.3 GHz, but the MT8382 incorporates a more capable GPU. This translates to slightly better graphics performance in the H7S, potentially resulting in smoother scrolling and a more responsive user interface. While neither chipset is a powerhouse, the MT8382 offers a marginal advantage for light gaming and video decoding. Both devices are limited by the 28nm manufacturing process, meaning thermal throttling could occur during sustained workloads, though the low clock speeds mitigate this risk.
Battery Life
Both tablets feature 10W wired charging. Battery capacity is not specified, but given the similar form factors and target market, they likely house batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. The MT8382 in the H7S *may* consume slightly more power under load, but the difference is unlikely to be significant in real-world usage. Expect approximately 4-6 hours of screen-on time with moderate usage on both devices. 0-100% charging times will likely be in the 3-4 hour range due to the low wattage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview Viva 1003G Lite if you need a tablet solely for extremely light tasks like reading ebooks, browsing simple websites, and basic video playback. It's ideal for users on the tightest of budgets. Buy the Allview Viva H7S if you prefer a slightly more responsive experience, anticipate running multiple apps simultaneously, or want a tablet that feels a bit more future-proof, even within the budget segment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Allview Viva H7S handle basic games like Candy Crush or Angry Birds?
Yes, the MT8382 chipset in the H7S should be capable of running less demanding games like Candy Crush or Angry Birds without significant issues. However, don't expect to play graphically intensive titles at high settings. The 1003G Lite will also run these games, but may experience occasional slowdowns.
❓ Is either tablet suitable for video conferencing?
Both tablets can handle basic video conferencing through apps like Skype or Zoom, but the experience will be limited by the camera quality and potentially the microphone. Expect adequate audio and video quality in well-lit environments. The MT8382 in the H7S might offer slightly smoother video decoding.
❓ Can I expect regular software updates on either device?
Given Allview's position in the budget market, regular software updates are unlikely. Both tablets will likely ship with an older version of Android and may not receive significant updates beyond security patches, if any. Don't rely on long-term software support.
