Both the Allview Viva 1003G Lite and the Allview Viva H10 HD target the ultra-budget tablet market. While visually similar, a key difference lies under the hood: the chipset. This comparison dissects the Mediatek MT8321A in the 1003G Lite versus the MT8382 in the H10 HD, revealing which tablet delivers a smoother experience for everyday tasks.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing basic functionality like web browsing and video playback, the Allview Viva H10 HD offers a slight edge due to its MT8382 chipset. While both utilize the same Cortex-A7 architecture, the MT8382 provides a modest performance uplift, making it the better choice for multitasking and slightly more demanding applications.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2014, July. Released 2014, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 246.2 x 171.7 x 10.7 mm (9.69 x 6.76 x 0.42 in) | 258 x 168 x 9.6 mm (10.16 x 6.61 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 505.2 g (1.11 lb) | 659.4 (1.45 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~70.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~68.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8321A (28 nm) | Mediatek MT8382 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400 | Mali-400MP2 |
| OS | Android 8.1 Oreo (Go edition) | Android 4.4 (KitKat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM | 8GB 1GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 0.3 MP | 3.15 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | VGA |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Stand-by | Up to 400 h | Up to 400 h |
| Talk time | Up to 8 h 20 min | Up to 7 h 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 8000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, White |
| Price | About 100 EUR | - |
| SAR EU | 1.05 W/kg (body) | 0.79 W/kg (body) |
Allview Viva 1003G Lite
- Potentially lower price point.
- Sufficient for very basic tasks.
- Likely lightweight and portable.
- Less powerful chipset (MT8321A).
- May struggle with multitasking.
- Limited gaming capabilities.
Allview Viva H10 HD
- Slightly more powerful chipset (MT8382).
- Smoother multitasking experience.
- Better suited for web browsing.
- Potentially higher price.
- Still limited by Cortex-A7 architecture.
- Camera performance likely similar to the 1003G Lite.
Display Comparison
Neither Allview provides detailed display specifications. Given the price point, both tablets likely utilize IPS LCD panels with similar resolutions (likely HD). The absence of information regarding brightness levels or color gamut coverage suggests neither device will excel in outdoor visibility or color accuracy. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both models, consistent with budget tablet designs. The focus here is on functionality, not visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a differentiating factor. Allview typically equips its budget tablets with basic cameras. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume both tablets feature low-resolution sensors (likely 2MP or 5MP) capable of capturing acceptable photos in well-lit conditions. Image quality will be limited by the sensor size, lack of optical image stabilization (OIS), and basic image processing algorithms. The cameras are best suited for occasional snapshots and video calls, not serious photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Allview Viva 1003G Lite features the Mediatek MT8321A, while the H10 HD uses the MT8382. Both are quad-core processors based on the Cortex-A7 architecture clocked at 1.3 GHz. However, the MT8382 generally offers slightly better GPU performance and improved memory bandwidth. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother scrolling, particularly noticeable when switching between applications. Both chipsets are built on a 28nm process, meaning thermal throttling could be a concern during prolonged, intensive use, but given the limited processing power, this is less of a worry than on higher-end devices.
Battery Life
Both tablets feature 10W wired charging. Battery capacity is not specified, but given the similar size and target market, they likely house batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. The MT8382 in the H10 HD, while slightly more powerful, is also marginally more efficient. This could translate to a slightly longer battery life, but the difference is unlikely to be significant. Expect around 4-6 hours of screen-on time with moderate usage on both devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview Viva 1003G Lite if you need a tablet for extremely light use – primarily static content consumption like reading ebooks or watching pre-downloaded videos. It’s ideal for those on the tightest of budgets. Buy the Allview Viva H10 HD if you anticipate any multitasking, light gaming, or frequent web browsing; the MT8382 chipset will provide a noticeably smoother experience, justifying the potential price difference.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Allview Viva H10 HD handle basic Android games like Candy Crush or Angry Birds?
Yes, the MT8382 chipset in the H10 HD should be capable of running less demanding Android games like Candy Crush or Angry Birds without significant issues. However, don't expect high frame rates or the ability to play graphically intensive titles.
❓ Is the lack of detailed specifications (like RAM and storage) a major concern?
Unfortunately, it is. The absence of RAM and storage details suggests both tablets likely feature minimal configurations (e.g., 1GB RAM and 8GB storage). This will limit the number of apps you can run simultaneously and the amount of data you can store locally. Consider using a microSD card for expandable storage if available.
❓ Can I expect software updates for either of these tablets?
Software update support for Allview's budget tablets is typically limited. It's unlikely that either the 1003G Lite or the H10 HD will receive major Android version updates. Expect only occasional security patches, if any.
