The Allview V4 Viper and Samsung Galaxy Core Prime represent different eras of the entry-level smartphone market. The Core Prime, a product of Samsung’s established brand recognition, relies on the older Snapdragon 410. The V4 Viper, however, leverages the more recent Mediatek Helio A22, promising improved efficiency and performance for the budget-conscious user. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device offers the best value in 2024.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a functional and relatively modern smartphone experience, the Allview V4 Viper is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Helio A22 chipset, built on a 12nm process, provides a noticeable performance and efficiency advantage over the Samsung Galaxy Core Prime’s aging Snapdragon 410, fabricated on a less efficient 28nm node.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - G360F |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 38 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28 - G360G |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 2, 4, 12 - G360T (T-Mobile) |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2014, November. Released 2014, November |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 145.8 x 70.9 x 8.5 mm (5.74 x 2.79 x 0.33 in) | 130.8 x 67.9 x 8.8 mm (5.15 x 2.67 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Single SIM (Micro-SIM) or Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 138 g (4.87 oz) | 130 g (4.59 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~207 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 81.1 cm2 (~78.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.5 inches, 57.6 cm2 (~64.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 306 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 4.4.4 (KitKat), upgradable to 5.1.1 (Lollipop) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 8GB 1GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 4.5 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.6, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 2 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | Yes (LTE models, except SM-G360BT) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| | - | Digital TV (SM-G360BT) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Music play | - | Up to 60 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 13 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 2700 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 2000 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Red | Black, White, Gray |
| Models | - | SM-G360T, SM-G3606, SM-G3608, SM-G3609, SM-G360BT, SM-G360F, SM-G360FY, SM-G360G, SM-G360GY, SM-G360H, SM-G360H/D, SM-G360BT, SM-G361, SM-G361H, SM-G361F, SM-G360HU, SM-G360T1, SM-G360M, SM-G360P, SM-G360V, SM-S820L, SM-G360AZ, SM-G361HU |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.70 W/kg (head) 1.07 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 1.13 W/kg (head) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.40 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Performance | - |
Basemark X: 1895 |
Allview V4 Viper
- More efficient Mediatek Helio A22 chipset
- Higher CPU clock speed for better performance
- Likely benefits from newer software optimizations
- Camera specifications are unknown
- Brand recognition is lower than Samsung
Samsung Galaxy Core Prime
- Established Samsung brand reputation
- Potentially wider availability of accessories
- Familiar Samsung user interface (for existing users)
- Outdated and inefficient Snapdragon 410 chipset
- Lower CPU clock speed resulting in slower performance
- Likely shorter battery life due to chipset inefficiency
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications in the provided data. However, given their market segment, it’s reasonable to assume both utilize LCD panels with resolutions around 720p. The Core Prime, being an older model, likely has larger bezels. The V4 Viper, benefiting from more recent manufacturing techniques, *may* have slightly thinner bezels, but this is speculative. Color accuracy and brightness are likely similar, targeting basic visibility rather than media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Given the target market, image quality is unlikely to be a primary strength for either. The absence of sensor size or aperture information suggests both utilize basic sensors. The V4 Viper, being a newer device, *may* benefit from slightly improved image processing algorithms, but this is speculative. The lack of detail makes a meaningful comparison impossible without further information.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Allview V4 Viper’s Mediatek Helio A22 (12nm) boasts a quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU, while the Samsung Galaxy Core Prime’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 (28nm) features a quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU. The 12nm fabrication process of the Helio A22 is significantly more efficient than the 28nm process of the Snapdragon 410, resulting in lower power consumption and less heat generation. This translates to better battery life and reduced thermal throttling under sustained load. While both CPUs utilize the same Cortex-A53 architecture, the higher clock speed of the Helio A22 provides a performance edge, making the V4 Viper noticeably snappier in everyday tasks.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the more efficient Mediatek Helio A22 in the V4 Viper will undoubtedly contribute to longer battery life compared to the power-hungry Snapdragon 410 in the Core Prime. The 28nm process of the Snapdragon 410 requires more power to operate, even during idle states. While charging wattage is also unknown, the V4 Viper’s chipset efficiency will result in a longer usable time between charges, even with a similarly sized battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview V4 Viper if you prioritize a more responsive user experience, better battery life, and a chipset that isn’t showing its age. This phone is ideal for users who need basic smartphone functionality – calling, texting, social media, and light app usage – without significant lag. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Core Prime if you are specifically seeking a Samsung-branded device and are willing to accept compromises in performance and efficiency. It may appeal to users deeply embedded in the Samsung ecosystem, but the hardware is demonstrably less capable.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 410 in the Galaxy Core Prime struggle with modern app updates?
Yes, the Snapdragon 410 is a relatively old chipset. Newer app updates are often optimized for more powerful processors, and the 410 may experience significant lag or compatibility issues with demanding applications. The Helio A22 in the V4 Viper, while still an entry-level chip, is more likely to handle these updates without major performance degradation.
❓ Does the Mediatek Helio A22 in the V4 Viper support 64-bit applications?
Yes, the Mediatek Helio A22 is a 64-bit processor and fully supports 64-bit applications. This is important as many modern apps are now exclusively 64-bit, ensuring compatibility and optimal performance on the V4 Viper. The Snapdragon 410 also supports 64-bit, but its overall processing power is lower.
❓ Is the difference in chipset fabrication process (28nm vs 12nm) really that significant in everyday use?
Absolutely. A smaller fabrication process (like 12nm) means more transistors can be packed into the same space, leading to increased efficiency and reduced heat. This translates directly to longer battery life, less thermal throttling, and a smoother user experience, even with basic tasks. The 28nm Snapdragon 410 consumes considerably more power for the same level of performance.
