Allview's V4 Viper Pro and X2 Xtreme represent different approaches to the budget smartphone market. The V4 Viper Pro aims for efficiency, while the X2 Xtreme prioritizes raw processing power. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device delivers the best user experience given their respective hardware choices.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing responsiveness and multitasking, the Allview X2 Xtreme is the clear winner thanks to its octa-core Helio X10 chipset. While the V4 Viper Pro offers a more power-efficient processor, the X2 Xtreme’s performance advantage outweighs this benefit for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20, 38 | 1, 7, 33, 38, 39 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, January. Released 2020, January | 2015, June. Released 2015, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 171 x 82 x 8.8 mm (6.73 x 3.23 x 0.35 in) | 164 x 82 x 9.6 mm (6.46 x 3.23 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 191.6 g (6.77 oz) | 204.4 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 640 x 1352 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~220 ppi density) | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~490 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 115.4 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 99.2 cm2 (~73.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6739 (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6795 Helio X10 (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8100 | PowerVR G6200 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 5.1 (Lollipop) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 24 MP, 1/2.3", PDAF, OIS |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 350 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 12 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 3500 mAh | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Grey | Gold |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 490 EUR |
| SAR EU | 1.20 W/kg (head) | - |
Allview V4 Viper Pro
- Potentially better battery life due to the more efficient chipset.
- Lower price point is likely, given the less powerful hardware.
- Adequate for basic smartphone tasks.
- Significantly slower performance compared to the X2 Xtreme.
- Struggles with multitasking and demanding applications.
- Limited gaming capabilities.
Allview X2 Xtreme
- Faster performance thanks to the octa-core Helio X10 chipset.
- Smoother multitasking and app loading times.
- Better suited for gaming and demanding applications.
- Likely shorter battery life compared to the V4 Viper Pro.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Potentially more heat generation under heavy load.
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, display specifications are unavailable for either device. However, given their market positioning, it's reasonable to assume both utilize IPS LCD panels. The X2 Xtreme's more powerful chipset *could* support a higher resolution or refresh rate, but this is speculative. Color accuracy and brightness are likely similar, targeting the budget segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. It’s likely both devices feature similar low-end camera sensors. The X2 Xtreme’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Helio X10 chipset *may* offer slightly better image processing, resulting in improved dynamic range and noise reduction, but this is not guaranteed. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Allview X2 Xtreme boasts the Mediatek MT6795 Helio X10, an octa-core processor clocked at 2.0 GHz, built on a 28nm process. This contrasts sharply with the V4 Viper Pro’s Mediatek MT6739, a quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 also on 28nm. The X2 Xtreme’s eight cores provide significantly more parallel processing capability, translating to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved performance in graphically intensive applications. While both use the same fabrication process, the X10’s architecture is demonstrably more powerful. The V4 Viper Pro will be adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity data is missing for both devices. However, the V4 Viper Pro’s more efficient MT6739 chipset, with fewer cores operating at a lower clock speed, will likely result in longer battery life under similar usage conditions. The X2 Xtreme’s 10W wired charging is standard for this segment, and the V4 Viper Pro likely shares the same charging speed. The trade-off is performance versus longevity; the X2 Xtreme will drain the battery faster during intensive use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview V4 Viper Pro if you need a basic smartphone for essential tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and battery life is a primary concern. Buy the Allview X2 Xtreme if you prefer a smoother experience with more demanding apps, enjoy occasional gaming, and value faster performance over maximizing battery longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Allview X2 Xtreme overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Mediatek Helio X10 is known to generate more heat than the MT6739. While not a flagship-level chip, extended gaming on the X2 Xtreme *could* lead to thermal throttling, reducing performance to prevent overheating. However, given the phone's likely plastic construction and passive cooling, it's unlikely to become dangerously hot.
❓ Is the performance difference between the two phones noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The X2 Xtreme’s octa-core processor will result in snappier app launches, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall experience, even with everyday tasks. The V4 Viper Pro will function adequately, but may exhibit occasional lag or stuttering.
❓ Can the Allview X2 Xtreme handle popular mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The X2 Xtreme *can* run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but likely at lower graphics settings to maintain a playable frame rate. Expect compromises in visual fidelity. The V4 Viper Pro will struggle significantly with these titles, potentially offering an unplayable experience.
