The Allview V4 Viper Pro and A5 Quad represent Allview’s entry into the ultra-budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver basic smartphone functionality at a low price point, they differ significantly in their underlying hardware, particularly the chipset. This comparison will dissect those differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing even a slight performance edge, the Allview V4 Viper Pro is the better choice. Its Mediatek MT6739 chipset, built on a 28nm process, offers a more modern architecture than the A5 Quad’s Cortex-A7, resulting in a smoother user experience, despite both having the same core count and clock speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20, 38 | - |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, January. Released 2020, January | 2014, January. Released 2014, January |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 171 x 82 x 8.8 mm (6.73 x 3.23 x 0.35 in) | 129.2 x 68 x 10.9 mm (5.09 x 2.68 x 0.43 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 191.6 g (6.77 oz) | 153.7 (5.40 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 640 x 1352 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~220 ppi density) | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~217 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 115.4 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.3 inches, 52.6 cm2 (~59.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6739 (28 nm) | - |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8100 | Mali-400 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 4.2.2 (Jelly Bean) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 4GB 512MB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | - | 5 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | VGA |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 212 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 6 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 5 h 30 min (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 3500 mAh | Li-Ion 1700 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Grey | Black, White |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR EU | 1.20 W/kg (head) | - |
Allview V4 Viper Pro
- More modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A53)
- Potentially better battery life due to chipset efficiency
- 10W wired charging support
- Limited information available on display quality
- Likely basic camera performance
Allview A5 Quad
- Simpler user experience for basic tasks
- Potentially lower price point
- May be more readily available in certain regions
- Outdated CPU architecture (Cortex-A7)
- Likely poorer performance in multitasking
- Potentially slower charging
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, display specifications are not provided for either device. Given their price point, it’s reasonable to assume both utilize LCD panels with resolutions likely around 480x854 or similar. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both models. Color accuracy and brightness will likely be limited, making outdoor visibility a challenge. Without further data, a direct comparison is impossible, but expect a similar viewing experience on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent beyond the existence of cameras on both devices. Given the target market, expect low-resolution sensors and limited image quality. It’s highly probable that both phones feature a primary camera and a basic front-facing camera. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. Any claims of advanced camera features should be viewed with skepticism.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Allview V4 Viper Pro’s Mediatek MT6739, fabricated on a 28nm process, utilizes Cortex-A53 cores. While both phones feature quad-core 1.3 GHz CPUs, the Cortex-A53 architecture is significantly more efficient and offers improved instruction set support compared to the older Cortex-A7 found in the A5 Quad. This translates to better performance in multi-tasking and app responsiveness. The 28nm process node of the MT6739 also contributes to better thermal management, potentially reducing throttling under sustained load. The A5 Quad’s Cortex-A7, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Allview V4 Viper Pro’s MT6739 chipset, being more power-efficient, will likely result in slightly better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the A5 Quad. The V4 Viper Pro also supports 10W wired charging, which, while slow by modern standards, is likely faster than any charging capabilities offered by the A5 Quad. Expect both phones to require overnight charging for full capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview V4 Viper Pro if you need a device capable of handling basic multitasking and light app usage without significant lag. It’s ideal for users who occasionally browse the web, check social media, or use messaging apps. Buy the Allview A5 Quad if your primary needs are limited to calls, texts, and very basic functionality, and you prioritize simplicity over performance. It’s a good option for first-time smartphone users or those seeking a secondary device for emergencies.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Allview V4 Viper Pro handle popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
The Mediatek MT6739 chipset in the V4 Viper Pro should provide a reasonably smooth experience with Facebook and WhatsApp. While it won't be lightning-fast, the Cortex-A53 cores are sufficient for these applications. The A5 Quad’s Cortex-A7 may exhibit noticeable lag when switching between these apps.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the Allview V4 Viper Pro significantly faster than what the A5 Quad offers?
While 10W isn't fast charging by today's standards, it's likely a substantial improvement over the A5 Quad. The A5 Quad likely uses a slower, older charging standard. Expect the V4 Viper Pro to charge from 0-100% in approximately 3-4 hours, while the A5 Quad could take considerably longer.
❓ Can either of these phones run modern mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
Neither phone is well-suited for modern, graphically demanding games. While you might be able to run PUBG Mobile on the lowest settings with significant frame rate drops on the V4 Viper Pro, the A5 Quad will likely struggle even with the most basic games. These phones are designed for basic communication and light usage, not gaming.
