Allview targets the ultra-budget smartphone market with the V4 Viper Pro and A5 Easy. While both devices operate on the Android platform, a significant disparity in their underlying chipsets dictates a vastly different user experience. This comparison dissects the Mediatek MT6739 in the V4 Viper Pro against the older MT6572 in the A5 Easy, revealing which device delivers the most responsive performance for everyday tasks.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a minimally functional smartphone, the Allview V4 Viper Pro is the superior choice. Its quad-core MT6739 processor, while still entry-level, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the dual-core MT6572 in the A5 Easy, resulting in smoother app launches and multitasking, justifying a potential price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20, 38 | - |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, January. Released 2020, January | 2015, August. Released 2015, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 171 x 82 x 8.8 mm (6.73 x 3.23 x 0.35 in) | 125 x 62.5 x 9.9 mm (4.92 x 2.46 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 191.6 g (6.77 oz) | 121 g (4.27 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 640 x 1352 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~220 ppi density) | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 115.4 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~58.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT, 256K colors |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6739 (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6572 (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8100 | Mali-400 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 5.1 (Lollipop) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDHC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 8GB 1GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | - | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | VGA |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 200 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 7 h 40 min |
| Type | Li-Po 3500 mAh | Li-Ion 1400 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Grey | Black, White |
| Price | About 170 EUR | - |
| SAR EU | 1.20 W/kg (head) | 1.32 W/kg (head) |
Allview V4 Viper Pro
- More powerful quad-core processor
- Potentially supports 4G LTE connectivity
- More efficient chipset for potentially better battery life
- Still an entry-level chipset
- Likely limited camera performance
Allview A5 Easy
- Extremely affordable
- Simple and easy to use for basic tasks
- Potentially longer standby time due to lower power consumption (though active use will be slower)
- Very slow dual-core processor
- Limited to 2G/3G connectivity
- Poor multitasking performance
Display Comparison
Neither Allview provides display specifications beyond size, so a detailed comparison is limited. However, given the target market, both likely utilize TN panels with modest brightness levels. The V4 Viper Pro’s more powerful chipset *could* support a slightly higher resolution display, but this is unconfirmed. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, reflecting their budget positioning.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but given the price point, expectations should be tempered. Both devices likely feature basic sensors with limited low-light performance. The V4 Viper Pro’s more capable chipset *might* allow for slightly better image processing, but the quality will primarily be dictated by the sensor itself, which is unknown. Any claims of advanced features like HDR or scene detection should be viewed skeptically.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Allview V4 Viper Pro’s Mediatek MT6739, built on a 28nm process, features a quad-core Cortex-A53 CPU clocked at 1.3 GHz. This architecture, while dated, offers a significant advantage over the A5 Easy’s MT6572, which utilizes a dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7. The Cortex-A53 is more efficient and capable than the A7, translating to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The MT6739 also supports more modern connectivity options, potentially including 4G LTE, while the MT6572 is largely limited to 2G/3G. The V4’s chipset is better equipped to handle the demands of modern Android, even if it’s a heavily customized version.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the MT6739’s improved efficiency in the V4 Viper Pro could translate to slightly longer battery life despite potentially powering a larger display or supporting 4G connectivity. Both devices feature 10W wired charging, indicating relatively slow charging speeds. Expect several hours to fully charge from 0-100%.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview V4 Viper Pro if you need a smartphone capable of handling basic social media, light web browsing, and occasional app usage without frustrating lag. It’s suitable for users who prioritize a slightly more responsive experience. Buy the Allview A5 Easy if your needs are extremely limited – primarily making and receiving calls and sending basic text messages – and you are on the tightest of budgets. It represents a bare-bones smartphone experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Allview V4 Viper Pro run popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook smoothly?
The V4 Viper Pro should handle WhatsApp and Facebook adequately, but don't expect a fluid experience with multiple apps open simultaneously. The quad-core processor provides a noticeable improvement over the A5 Easy, but it's still an entry-level chipset. Expect some loading times and occasional lag.
❓ Is the Allview A5 Easy suitable for someone who has never used a smartphone before?
The A5 Easy's simplicity makes it potentially suitable for a first-time smartphone user, *if* their needs are extremely basic – primarily making and receiving calls and sending texts. However, its limited performance may be frustrating for anyone accustomed to modern smartphone responsiveness.
❓ Can either of these phones be used for mobile gaming?
Neither phone is suitable for serious mobile gaming. The processors lack the graphical power to run demanding games at playable frame rates. Simple, older games might be playable on the V4 Viper Pro at low settings, but the A5 Easy will struggle even with basic titles.
