The Allview Soul X7 Style and P9 Energy Lite (2017) represent different approaches to the budget smartphone market. The X7 Style, released later, boasts a more modern chipset, while the P9 Energy Lite focuses on providing a functional experience at an even lower price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Allview Soul X7 Style is the superior choice. Its Helio P23 chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the P9 Energy Lite’s MT6753, translating to smoother multitasking and app loading. While both phones target the budget segment, the X7 Style’s improved processing power justifies the likely price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40 | 1, 3, 7, 20, 38 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 26. Released 2020, May 26 | 2017, June. Released 2017, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 157.6 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.20 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 148.7 x 72.4 x 9.1 mm (5.85 x 2.85 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 184.7 g (6.53 oz) | 161 g (5.68 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.21 inches, 96.3 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~69.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6763 Helio P23 (16 nm) | Mediatek MT6753 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 | Mali-T720 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 7.0 (Nougat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Music play | Up to 34 h | - |
| Stand-by | Up to 840 h (2G) / Up to 840 h (3G) | Up to 286 h |
| Talk time | Up to 12 h (2G) / Up to 4 h 30 min (3G) | Up to 16 h |
| Type | Li-Po 3400 mAh battery | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Turcoise | Black, Gold |
| Price | About 130 EUR | - |
| SAR EU | 0.87 W/kg (head) | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -88.3dB / Crosstalk -82.1dB | - |
| Camera |
Photo | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 635:1 (nominal), 1.281 (sunlight) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 75dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 75dB
| - |
Allview Soul X7 Style
- Significantly faster processor (Helio P23)
- More efficient chipset (16nm process)
- Potentially better outdoor visibility (higher contrast ratio)
- Camera specifications are unknown
- Battery capacity and charging speed are unknown
Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017)
- Likely lower price point
- Potentially larger battery capacity (implied by 'Energy' branding)
- Functional for basic tasks
- Slower processor (MT6753)
- Less efficient chipset (28nm process)
- Likely lower display quality
Display Comparison
The available data only provides contrast ratios for the Soul X7 Style: 635:1 nominal and 1.281 in sunlight. This suggests a reasonably viewable display, particularly outdoors. The P9 Energy Lite’s display specifications are absent, but given its market positioning, it likely features a lower contrast ratio and potentially lower peak brightness. The X7 Style’s higher sunlight contrast ratio indicates better visibility under direct sunlight, a crucial factor for outdoor use. Without knowing the panel technology of either device, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
The context data only states 'Photo' for the Soul X7 Style’s camera, offering no specifics on sensor size, aperture, or features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). The P9 Energy Lite’s camera details are also missing. Given both phones’ budget nature, it’s reasonable to assume they feature basic camera setups. Without further information, it’s impossible to definitively declare a winner. However, a newer device like the X7 Style *may* incorporate improved image processing algorithms, potentially leading to better image quality even with similar hardware.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Allview Soul X7 Style utilizes the Mediatek MT6763 Helio P23, a 16nm process node chip with an octa-core CPU configuration split into two clusters: 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53. This contrasts sharply with the P9 Energy Lite’s MT6753, built on a larger 28nm process and featuring a uniform octa-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 setup. The P23’s smaller node and higher clock speeds translate to significantly improved CPU performance and greater energy efficiency. The P23 also benefits from architectural improvements within the Cortex-A53 cores, further enhancing its capabilities. Users will experience faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and better overall responsiveness on the X7 Style.
Battery Life
Battery capacity and charging wattage are not provided for either device. However, the P9 Energy Lite’s name suggests a focus on battery life, potentially indicating a larger battery capacity. The X7 Style’s more efficient Helio P23 chipset could offset a potentially smaller battery, offering comparable real-world battery performance. Without concrete data, it’s difficult to assess which phone offers superior battery life or faster charging speeds. The 28nm process of the MT6753 in the P9 Energy Lite is less efficient, meaning it will likely consume more power for the same tasks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview Soul X7 Style if you prioritize responsiveness and a smoother user experience, especially if you plan to use demanding apps or play mobile games. Buy the Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light web browsing – and you are seeking the absolute lowest possible price point, accepting compromises in performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Allview Soul X7 Style handle modern mobile games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While the Helio P23 isn't a high-end gaming chip, it's capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings. Expect some frame drops during intense action, but the experience should be playable. The P9 Energy Lite’s MT6753 will struggle with these titles, likely requiring very low settings and still experiencing significant lag.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera information a major concern for the Allview Soul X7 Style?
Given the price point of both devices, expecting flagship-level camera performance is unrealistic. The absence of specific details suggests basic camera modules. However, newer devices often benefit from improved image processing software, potentially giving the X7 Style an edge in image quality despite similar hardware.
❓ How much of a real-world performance difference will I notice between the Helio P23 and MT6753?
The difference will be quite noticeable in everyday tasks. The Helio P23’s faster CPU and more efficient architecture will result in snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface. The MT6753 will feel sluggish in comparison, especially when running multiple apps or demanding applications.
