Allview caters to the budget-conscious smartphone user, but even within that segment, choices exist. The Soul X7 Style and P10 Life represent different approaches: the X7 Style aiming for a balance of features and performance, while the P10 Life prioritizes affordability. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Allview Soul X7 Style is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Helio P23 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the P10 Life’s MT6739, making it better suited for multitasking, moderate gaming, and smoother app experiences. While the P10 Life is cheaper, the performance trade-off is significant.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40 | 1, 3, 7, 20, 38 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 26. Released 2020, May 26 | 2019, January. Released 2019, January |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 157.6 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.20 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 149.4 x 71.9 x 9.4 mm (5.88 x 2.83 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 184.7 g (6.53 oz) | 177.6 g (6.28 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) | 480 x 960 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~201 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.21 inches, 96.3 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.34 inches, 73.6 cm2 (~68.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6763 Helio P23 (16 nm) | Mediatek MT6739 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 | - |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 8.1 (Oreo) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Music play | Up to 34 h | - |
| Stand-by | Up to 840 h (2G) / Up to 840 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 12 h (2G) / Up to 4 h 30 min (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 3400 mAh battery | Li-Po 2500 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Turcoise | Blue |
| Price | About 130 EUR | - |
| SAR EU | 0.87 W/kg (head) | 0.80 W/kg (head) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -88.3dB / Crosstalk -82.1dB | - |
| Camera |
Photo | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 635:1 (nominal), 1.281 (sunlight) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 75dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 75dB
| - |
Allview Soul X7 Style
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- More power-efficient chipset for longer battery life
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Better sunlight readability (based on contrast ratio)
- Likely higher price than the P10 Life
- Limited information on display quality beyond contrast ratio
Allview P10 Life
- Lower price point for budget-conscious buyers
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Potentially lighter and more compact design (speculation)
- Adequate for basic communication tasks
- Slow processor struggles with multitasking and demanding apps
- Less power-efficient chipset leads to shorter battery life
- Likely lower-quality display
- Limited camera capabilities
Display Comparison
The available data only provides contrast ratios for the Soul X7 Style: 635:1 nominal and 1.281 in sunlight. This suggests a reasonably viewable display even outdoors, though it doesn't indicate panel technology (likely IPS LCD). The P10 Life’s display specifications are absent, making a direct comparison impossible. However, given its lower price point, it likely features a lower-quality panel with narrower viewing angles and less accurate color reproduction. The X7 Style’s sunlight contrast ratio is a key advantage for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones’ camera details are limited to 'Photo'. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is difficult. However, the X7 Style’s more powerful chipset likely allows for faster image processing and potentially better image quality, even with similar sensors. The P10 Life’s weaker processor may struggle with complex image processing algorithms, resulting in slower capture times and potentially lower-quality photos, particularly in low-light conditions. We can assume the P10 Life will have a more basic camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Allview Soul X7 Style’s Mediatek MT6763 Helio P23 (16nm) features an octa-core CPU (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53), offering significantly more processing power than the Allview P10 Life’s Mediatek MT6739 (28nm) quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53. The 16nm process node of the Helio P23 is more efficient, leading to better battery life and less heat generation under load. The P10 Life’s 28nm process is older and less efficient. This translates to a noticeably slower experience on the P10 Life, especially when multitasking or running demanding applications. The X7 Style will handle more complex tasks with greater ease.
Battery Life
Battery capacity data is missing for both devices. However, the Helio P23’s 16nm process in the X7 Style is more power-efficient than the P10 Life’s 28nm MT6739. This means the X7 Style will likely deliver longer battery life on a single charge, even if the battery capacities are similar. Charging wattage is also unknown, but the X7 Style’s more modern chipset might support faster charging protocols, though this is speculative.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview Soul X7 Style if you need a phone capable of handling more demanding apps, occasional gaming, and a generally more responsive user experience. It’s ideal for users who want a phone that won’t feel sluggish after a few months of use. Buy the Allview P10 Life if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light web browsing – and you are on an extremely tight budget where every dollar counts.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Allview P10 Life struggle with popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram?
The P10 Life’s MT6739 chipset is relatively weak. While it can run these apps, you may experience noticeable lag, slow loading times, and occasional crashes, especially when multitasking or using the apps for extended periods. The X7 Style will provide a much smoother experience.
❓ Is the Allview Soul X7 Style a good choice for playing mobile games?
The X7 Style is better suited for gaming than the P10 Life, but it’s not a gaming powerhouse. The Helio P23 can handle less demanding games at medium settings. However, graphically intensive titles may require lower settings and still experience some frame rate drops. The P10 Life will struggle with most modern mobile games.
❓ How much of a difference will the 16nm vs 28nm process node make in real-world battery life?
The difference is significant. A smaller process node (16nm) means the chipset consumes less power for the same level of performance. This translates to potentially 20-30% longer battery life on the Soul X7 Style compared to the P10 Life, assuming similar battery capacities. You'll notice this difference during everyday use.
