The Allview Soul X7 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F4 represent different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Soul X7 Pro aims for affordability with a familiar Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, while the Poco F4 leverages the more powerful Snapdragon 870 to deliver near-flagship performance at a competitive price. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the vast majority of users, the Xiaomi Poco F4 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift, coupled with significantly faster 67W charging. While the Allview Soul X7 Pro offers a lower entry price, the Poco F4’s superior experience justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat7 300/100 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 26. Released 2020, May 26 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 76.8 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 508 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Desire | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | - | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | About 230 EUR | ₹ 16,999 |
| SAR EU | 1.12 W/kg (head) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9)
GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Allview Soul X7 Pro
- Lower price point
- Functional for basic tasks
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Significantly slower performance
- Slow charging speed
- Limited display brightness
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Exceptional performance with Snapdragon 870
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Higher price than Allview Soul X7 Pro
- May be overkill for basic users
- Potentially larger size/weight
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1003 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Allview Soul X7 Pro. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays likely utilize IPS LCD technology (given the price points), the Poco F4’s higher peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggest a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. The Soul X7 Pro’s display specifications are limited, making a detailed comparison difficult, but it’s unlikely to match the Poco F4’s visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but details are sparse for the Allview Soul X7 Pro. The Poco F4 likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Snapdragon 870, offering improved image processing and noise reduction. Without specific sensor details for the Soul X7 Pro, it’s difficult to assess its camera performance, but it’s reasonable to assume the Poco F4 will deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Poco F4’s camera system is likely to include features like HDR and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS), further enhancing its photographic capabilities.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Xiaomi Poco F4’s Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a significant leap forward from the Allview Soul X7 Pro’s Snapdragon 630 (14nm). The 870 features a Kryo 585 architecture with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, offering considerably faster processing speeds and improved efficiency. The 630’s Cortex-A53 cores, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with demanding games and multitasking. The 7nm process node of the 870 also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended use. The Poco F4 is designed for smooth gaming and app performance, while the Soul X7 Pro is geared towards basic functionality.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 101 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the Poco F4’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support is a game-changer. It can reach 100% charge in just 38 minutes, while the Allview Soul X7 Pro’s 18W charging is significantly slower. This faster charging capability provides a much more convenient user experience, allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day. While the mAh capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Poco F4’s charging speed effectively mitigates any potential battery capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview Soul X7 Pro if you prioritize absolute minimum cost and only need a phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. It’s a functional device for users on a very tight budget. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 if you value performance for gaming, demanding apps, and faster charging, and are willing to spend a bit more for a significantly improved user experience. It’s ideal for students, mobile gamers, and anyone who wants a responsive and future-proof device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 630 in the Allview Soul X7 Pro sufficient for playing modern mobile games?
The Snapdragon 630 is not ideal for demanding modern mobile games. While it can handle less graphically intensive titles, you'll likely experience frame drops and lag in popular games like PUBG or Genshin Impact. The Poco F4’s Snapdragon 870 is far better suited for gaming.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco F4 compared to the 18W charging on the Allview Soul X7 Pro in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Poco F4 is dramatically faster. It can fully charge the phone in approximately 38 minutes, whereas the Allview Soul X7 Pro’s 18W charging will likely take well over two hours to reach 100%. This difference is significant for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Poco F4 get excessively hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F4 is relatively efficient, and Xiaomi has implemented thermal management solutions to mitigate overheating. While some warmth is expected during extended gaming, it’s unlikely to reach uncomfortable levels or cause significant performance throttling, unlike the Snapdragon 630 which is more prone to throttling.
