The Allview Soul X7 Pro and Oppo Reno7 5G represent different approaches to the mid-range 5G smartphone market. The Allview focuses on providing a functional experience at a lower price point, while the Oppo Reno7 5G aims for a more premium feel with faster charging and a more powerful processor. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and convenience, the Oppo Reno7 5G is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset and 65W charging significantly outperform the Allview Soul X7 Pro’s Snapdragon 630 and 18W charging. However, budget-conscious users may find the Allview a viable, if slower, alternative.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat7 300/100 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 26. Released 2020, May 26 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 76.8 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 508 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Desire | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | - | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR EU | 1.12 W/kg (head) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9)
GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Allview Soul X7 Pro
- Lower price point makes it accessible.
- Functional 5G connectivity.
- Acceptable battery endurance (123h)
- Outdated Snapdragon 630 chipset.
- Slow 18W charging.
- Limited display specifications.
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 900 processor.
- Ultra-fast 65W charging (0-100% in 31 min).
- Brighter and higher contrast display.
- Higher price compared to the Allview.
- May be overkill for basic smartphone users.
- No detailed camera specifications available.
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno7 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 635 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Allview Soul X7 Pro. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. While both phones offer a 'Photo/Video' capable display, the Reno7’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The Allview’s display specifications are lacking, making it difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, the Reno7 5G, being a more recent and higher-tier device, likely benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially a larger sensor, resulting in better low-light performance and overall image quality. The absence of details on the Allview suggests a more basic camera system.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno7 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 900, built on a 6nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Allview Soul X7 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (14nm). The Dimensity 900’s octa-core configuration, featuring 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, is architecturally superior to the Snapdragon 630’s 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 setup. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 123 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the Allview’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the charging experience is drastically different. The Oppo Reno7 5G’s 65W wired charging can fully charge the device in just 31 minutes, a significant advantage over the Allview Soul X7 Pro’s slower 18W charging. The Reno7 5G also supports reverse wired charging, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview Soul X7 Pro if you need a functional 5G smartphone on a very tight budget and aren't demanding in terms of gaming or multitasking. Buy the Oppo Reno7 5G if you prioritize faster performance, quicker charging, and a more refined user experience, and are willing to pay a premium for those features.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek Dimensity 900 in the Oppo Reno7 5G prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 900, built on a 6nm process, is generally efficient and manages heat well. While some throttling may occur during prolonged, graphically intensive gaming, it's unlikely to be a significant issue for most users. The Reno7 5G's thermal design should adequately dissipate heat, preventing performance degradation.
❓ Given the lack of detailed camera specs for the Allview Soul X7 Pro, is the camera suitable for casual photography?
The Allview Soul X7 Pro's camera is likely adequate for basic, casual photography in good lighting conditions. However, its performance in low-light scenarios is expected to be limited due to the lack of advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS) or a large sensor. Don't expect flagship-level image quality.
❓ Does the Oppo Reno7 5G support high refresh rate gaming, like 90fps in PUBG Mobile?
While the Reno7 5G's display specifications aren't explicitly stated, the Dimensity 900 chipset is capable of supporting high refresh rates. Whether PUBG Mobile can achieve a consistent 90fps will depend on the game's settings and optimization, but the hardware is certainly capable of delivering a smooth gaming experience.
