Looking for an affordable smartphone without breaking the bank? The Allview P6 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Core II are both contenders in the budget market. But which one delivers the best experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Core II edges out the Allview P6 Pro thanks to its slightly faster processor and Samsung's generally more polished software experience. Both offer decent value, but the Core II provides a more refined overall package for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 TD-LTE 2600 | - |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, November. Released 2015, November | 2014, June. Released 2014, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 144 x 73 x 8.1 mm (5.67 x 2.87 x 0.32 in) | 130.3 x 68 x 9.8 mm (5.13 x 2.68 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 154 g (5.43 oz) | 138 g (4.87 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~207 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~65.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.5 inches, 57.6 cm2 (~65.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT, 256K colors |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-T720 | - |
| OS | Android 5.1 (Lollipop) | Android 4.4.2 (KitKat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 4GB 768MB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 5 MP, AF |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 480p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | VGA |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, EDR | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Music play | - | Up to 30 h |
| Stand-by | Up to 392 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 13 h 40 min (3G) | Up to 7 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 3140 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 2000 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | White, Black |
| Models | P6 PRO | SM-G355H, SM-G355HN, SM-G355M |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.42 W/kg (head) 0.45 W/kg (body) |
Allview P6 Pro
- Very affordable
- Basic functionality
- Decent for calls and messaging
- Slower performance
- Lower quality camera
- Less polished software
- Potentially shorter battery life
Samsung Galaxy Core II
- Slightly faster processor
- Better camera quality
- More reliable brand
- Potentially longer battery life
- More refined software experience
- Still a budget phone with limitations
- Screen resolution is basic
- May feel dated compared to newer phones
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar sized displays, likely around 4.5-5 inches, with resolutions around 800x480 or 854x480. The Samsung Galaxy Core II might offer slightly better color accuracy and viewing angles due to Samsung's display technology, though both will be adequate for basic usage. Expect IPS panels on both.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy Core II likely has a better camera, potentially a 5MP or 8MP rear camera with improved image processing compared to the Allview P6 Pro's likely 5MP camera. Samsung's software often provides better image quality in various lighting conditions. Front-facing cameras are likely 1.3MP on both.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy Core II holds a slight advantage here with its 1.2 GHz quad-core processor compared to the Allview P6 Pro's 1.0 GHz quad-core. While both are Cortex-A53 processors, the higher clock speed generally translates to snappier performance in everyday tasks and slightly better multitasking capabilities. Expect some lag on both devices with demanding apps.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy Core II likely has a slightly larger battery capacity (around 2000mAh) compared to the Allview P6 Pro (likely around 1800mAh). This, combined with the slightly more efficient processor, could result in marginally better battery life on the Core II.
Buying Guide
The Allview P6 Pro is a good choice for users prioritizing a very low price point and basic functionality. The Samsung Galaxy Core II is better suited for those seeking a slightly smoother performance, a more reliable brand, and a generally more user-friendly experience, even within a budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Samsung Galaxy Core II is slightly better for gaming due to its faster processor, but neither phone is ideal for demanding games. Expect low settings and potential lag.
❓ Are these phones still supported with software updates?
Both phones are quite old, so ongoing software updates are unlikely. Security updates are also probably discontinued. Consider this when evaluating long-term use.
