The Allview P10 Mini and P9 Energy Lite (2017) represent Allview’s attempts to capture the budget smartphone market. While both aim for affordability, they differ significantly in their internal hardware. The P9 Energy Lite, released in 2017, features a Mediatek MT6753 chipset with an octa-core CPU, while the P10 Mini utilizes a quad-core processor. This comparison will dissect these differences to determine which device offers the best value for users seeking a basic, functional smartphone.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing multitasking and responsiveness, the Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) is the better choice. Its octa-core Mediatek MT6753 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the P10 Mini’s quad-core processor, making it more suitable for running multiple apps and handling slightly more demanding tasks. However, the P10 Mini may appeal to those seeking a potentially simpler, more streamlined experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20, 38 | 1, 3, 7, 20, 38 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, April. Released 2019, April | 2017, June. Released 2017, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 144.2 x 72 x 9.9 mm (5.68 x 2.83 x 0.39 in) | 148.7 x 72.4 x 9.1 mm (5.85 x 2.85 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 152.6 g (5.40 oz) | 161 g (5.68 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~66.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~69.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6753 (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-T720 |
| OS | Android 8.1 Oreo (Go edition) | Android 7.0 (Nougat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | 8 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 286 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 16 h |
| Type | Li-Po 2400 mAh battery | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Gold |
| SAR EU | 0.72 W/kg (head) | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
Allview P10 Mini
- Potentially simpler user experience due to fewer cores.
- May have a more modern design (depending on manufacturing date).
- Likely more affordable.
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the P9 Energy Lite.
- Limited multitasking capabilities.
- May struggle with demanding applications.
Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017)
- Octa-core processor provides superior performance.
- Better multitasking and app responsiveness.
- Potentially more efficient image processing.
- Older chipset technology.
- May have larger bezels.
- Potentially higher power consumption under heavy load.
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, display specifications are unavailable for either device. However, given their market segment, it’s reasonable to assume both utilize LCD panels with resolutions around 720p. The P9 Energy Lite’s 2017 release date suggests a potentially larger bezel size compared to the P10 Mini, which may benefit from slightly more modern design considerations. Color accuracy and brightness are likely to be similar, leaning towards the basic side, suitable for indoor use but potentially washed out in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse for both devices. It’s safe to assume both feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the P9 Energy Lite’s slightly older chipset may have more mature image processing algorithms, potentially leading to slightly better image quality in favorable lighting conditions. Any claims of advanced features like HDR or scene detection should be viewed with skepticism given the devices’ price point.
Performance
The core difference lies in the processors. The Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) boasts a Mediatek MT6753, an octa-core processor built on a 28nm process. This means eight Cortex-A53 cores running at 1.3 GHz. The Allview P10 Mini, conversely, uses a quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53. While both utilize the same core architecture, the P9 Energy Lite’s doubled core count provides a significant advantage in multi-threaded tasks. The 28nm process of the MT6753 also suggests potentially better power efficiency compared to an unknown process node for the P10 Mini’s CPU. This translates to smoother app switching, faster loading times, and a more responsive user interface on the P9 Energy Lite.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. Given the P9 Energy Lite’s “Energy” branding, it’s plausible it features a larger battery than the P10 Mini. However, the MT6753 chipset’s octa-core configuration may offset this advantage due to increased power consumption. Without concrete mAh figures and charging wattage details, it’s impossible to determine which device offers superior battery life. Real-world usage will be the deciding factor, with the P9 Energy Lite potentially benefiting from its more efficient processor under lighter loads.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview P10 Mini if you need a very basic smartphone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light web browsing, and prioritize simplicity. Buy the Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) if you prefer a device capable of handling more demanding applications, multitasking, and offer a smoother overall user experience, even if it means a slightly older chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek MT6753 in the P9 Energy Lite still capable of running modern apps?
While the MT6753 is an older chipset, it's still capable of running most common Android applications. However, expect slower loading times and potential lag with more demanding games or resource-intensive apps. It's best suited for basic tasks like social media, web browsing, and communication.
❓ Will the Allview P10 Mini struggle with multiple apps open at once?
Yes, the P10 Mini’s quad-core processor and limited RAM will likely struggle with multitasking. Running several apps simultaneously may result in significant slowdowns and app crashes. It’s best to focus on one task at a time for optimal performance.
❓ Which phone is better for light gaming?
The Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) is the better choice for light gaming. The octa-core processor provides a performance boost that will result in smoother frame rates and a more enjoyable gaming experience, even if it's limited to less demanding titles.
