The Allview P8 Energy Pro and P10 Max represent Allview's attempts to deliver affordable smartphones. While both target the budget-conscious consumer, they differ significantly in their core processing power. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on how the chipset impacts everyday use and performance expectations.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Allview P8 Energy Pro offers a more compelling experience. Its octa-core MT6753 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the P10 Max’s quad-core MT6739, making it better suited for multitasking and moderately demanding applications. While both are entry-level devices, the P8 Energy Pro delivers more for the money.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20, 38 | 1, 3, 7, 38, 39, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, April. Released 2019, April | 2016, February. Released 2016, February |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 160.7 x 77.7 x 8.3 mm (6.33 x 3.06 x 0.33 in) | 160.9 x 81.2 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 3.20 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 209.8 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 480 x 960 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~179 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~367 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.99 inches, 92.6 cm2 (~74.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 99.2 cm2 (~76.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6739 (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6753 (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-T720MP2 |
| OS | Android 8.1 Oreo (Go edition) | Android 5.1 (Lollipop) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 13 MP, f/2.0, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 450 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 22 h 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 3200 mAh battery | Li-Po 5020 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue Purple | Gold/Silver |
| Price | - | About 420 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.85 W/kg (head) | 0.40 W/kg (head) |
Allview P10 Max
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- May be lighter due to less complex chipset
- Significantly slower performance
- Struggles with multitasking
- Limited gaming capabilities
Allview P8 Energy Pro
- Faster and more responsive performance
- Better multitasking capabilities
- Improved graphics performance for gaming
- Potentially higher price
- May have slightly shorter battery life (depending on capacity)
- Slightly more complex chipset may generate more heat
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, detailed display specifications are unavailable. However, given the price bracket, both devices likely utilize IPS LCD panels with 720p resolutions. The absence of information regarding peak brightness or color gamut suggests neither phone will excel in outdoor visibility or color accuracy. Bezels are likely substantial on both models, typical for this segment. The user experience will likely be similar in terms of visual quality.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups. Given the brand’s positioning, image quality will likely be adequate for social media sharing but lacking in detail and dynamic range. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests low-light performance will be limited. Any claims of advanced features should be viewed with skepticism. Focusing on the chipset, the MT6753 in the P8 Energy Pro *may* offer slightly faster image processing speeds, but the sensor and lens quality will be the primary limiting factors.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Allview P8 Energy Pro’s Mediatek MT6753, with its octa-core Cortex-A53 CPU, offers a significant advantage over the P10 Max’s quad-core MT6739. While both are based on the same 28nm process, the increased core count in the MT6753 allows for better parallel processing. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved responsiveness. The MT6753’s Mali-T720 MP3 GPU also provides a boost in graphics performance, making it more capable of handling casual games. The P10 Max will struggle with more demanding tasks, exhibiting noticeable lag and slowdowns.
Battery Life
Battery capacity information is missing for both devices. However, the MT6753 in the P8 Energy Pro, despite having more cores, is generally more power-efficient than the MT6739 due to architectural improvements. This means the P8 Energy Pro could potentially offer comparable or even better battery life despite having a similar or smaller capacity battery. Charging wattage is also unknown, but given the budget nature of these phones, expect relatively slow charging speeds for both.
Buying Guide
Buy the Allview P10 Max if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light web browsing – and you prioritize a potentially lower price point. Buy the Allview P8 Energy Pro if you anticipate using your phone for more than just the basics, including social media, occasional gaming, or running multiple apps simultaneously. The P8 Energy Pro’s superior processing power will translate to a smoother, more responsive user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Allview P8 Energy Pro handle popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the octa-core MT6753 chipset in the P8 Energy Pro is well-equipped to handle social media apps without significant lag. The increased processing power compared to the P10 Max’s MT6739 will result in a smoother and more responsive experience while browsing feeds and using these applications.
❓ Is the Allview P10 Max suitable for playing mobile games?
The Allview P10 Max is only suitable for very basic, less demanding mobile games. The quad-core MT6739 chipset will struggle with most modern titles, resulting in low frame rates and noticeable lag. The P8 Energy Pro, with its Mali-T720 MP3 GPU, offers a significantly better gaming experience, though still limited to casual gaming.
❓ Does the MT6753 chipset in the P8 Energy Pro get noticeably hot during extended use?
While the MT6753 can generate some heat under sustained load, it's unlikely to reach critical temperatures given the phone's budget nature and likely limited thermal design. However, prolonged gaming or video recording may result in some warmth. The P10 Max, with its less powerful chipset, may run slightly cooler overall.
