Before smartphones dominated, feature phones reigned supreme. The Alcatel OT-602 and LG KP500 Cookie represent this era, offering basic communication and limited functionality. This comparison aims to dissect the known specifications of the Alcatel OT-602 and infer the LG KP500 Cookie’s position based on its market presence and brand reputation, given the lack of detailed specs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a functional, albeit basic, feature phone, the Alcatel OT-602 likely offers a slight advantage due to its documented 104 MHz CPU. While the LG KP500 Cookie was popular, the absence of core spec information makes a definitive recommendation difficult, leaning towards the Alcatel's known performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| EDGE | No | Class 10 |
| GPRS | Class 12 | Class 10 |
| Technology | GSM | GSM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2011, July. Released 2011, July | 2008, September. Released 2008, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 101.5 x 52.5 x 12.8 mm (4.00 x 2.07 x 0.50 in) | 106.5 x 55.4 x 11.9 mm (4.19 x 2.18 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | - | 89 g (3.14 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) | 240 x 400 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~155 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~33.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 3.0 inches, 25.6 cm2 (~43.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT resistive touchscreen, 256K colors | TFT resistive touchscreen, 256K colors |
| | - | Flash UI
Handwriting recognition |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | 40 dialed, 40 received, 40 missed calls |
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 3MB | 48MB |
| Phonebook | Yes, Photocall | 1000 entries, Photocall |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | 3.15 MP |
| Video | Yes | 320p@12fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP | 2.1, A2DP |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS | Stereo FM radio, RDS |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | 2.0 |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML |
| Games | Yes | 4 + downloadable |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.0 | Yes, MIDP 2.0 |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS, Email, IM | SMS, EMS, MMS, Email |
| Sensors | - | Accelerometer |
| | - | MP3/WMA/AAC player
MP4/H.263 player
Organizer
Document viewer (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF)
Voice memo
Predictive text input |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 560 h | Up to 350 h |
| Talk time | Up to 7 h | Up to 3 h 30 min |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 850 mAh battery | Removable Li-Ion 900 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium gray, Fuchsia, Cyber blue, Orange, Aubergine, Black | Black, Vandyke brown, Anodizing silver, Elegant gold, Delicious white, Pink |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 60 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -87.5dB / Crosstalk -63.0dB |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 78dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 82dB |
alcatel OT-602
- Known CPU speed (104 MHz) provides a performance baseline.
- Likely longer battery life due to lower processor demand.
- Availability of basic technical specifications.
- Limited functionality compared to modern smartphones.
- Low-resolution display and camera (likely).
LG KP500 Cookie
- Strong brand recognition from the late 2000s.
- Potentially optimized user interface.
- Compact and lightweight design (typical of feature phones).
- Lack of publicly available technical specifications.
- Unknown processor and RAM configuration.
- Reliance on anecdotal evidence for performance assessment.
Display Comparison
Neither device is expected to feature advanced display technology. Given the era, both likely utilized resistive touchscreens with limited color depth and resolution. The LG KP500 Cookie, marketed with a focus on its user interface, may have prioritized screen responsiveness over raw pixel count, but without specs, this is speculation. The Alcatel OT-602’s display quality is similarly unknown, but likely comparable to other phones of its time.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are unlikely to have featured cameras of significant quality. Feature phones of this era typically included low-resolution cameras (VGA or below) primarily for novelty. Any camera comparison would be largely irrelevant, as image quality would be poor on both devices. The absence of any camera specifications for the LG KP500 Cookie further reinforces this point.
Performance
The Alcatel OT-602’s 104 MHz CPU provides a baseline for performance. This processor would have been sufficient for basic calling, texting, and potentially simple games. The LG KP500 Cookie’s performance is entirely unknown. LG, at the time, focused on user experience, suggesting the Cookie may have optimized software to compensate for potentially lower hardware specifications. However, without knowing the chipset, RAM, or storage, a direct comparison is impossible. The Alcatel’s known CPU gives it a quantifiable edge.
Battery Life
Battery life on both devices would have been measured in days, rather than hours, due to the limited functionality and low-power processors. The Alcatel OT-602’s 104 MHz CPU likely consumed less power than a more powerful (but unknown) processor in the LG KP500 Cookie, potentially offering slightly longer battery life. However, battery capacity itself is a crucial factor, and this information is unavailable for either device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Alcatel OT-602 if you need a feature phone with a confirmed processor speed for basic tasks like calling and texting, and appreciate having some level of technical specification available. Buy the LG KP500 Cookie if you prioritize brand recognition from the late 2000s and are willing to accept a device with virtually no publicly available technical details, relying on anecdotal evidence and its user interface.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Alcatel OT-602 capable of running any modern applications?
No. The Alcatel OT-602’s operating system and 104 MHz processor are far too limited to run modern applications. It is designed for basic calling, texting, and potentially simple pre-installed games.
❓ What kind of user interface did the LG KP500 Cookie offer?
The LG KP500 Cookie was marketed for its user-friendly interface, which was considered relatively intuitive for a feature phone of its time. It featured a customizable home screen and a simplified menu system, but it was still limited compared to modern smartphone interfaces.
❓ Can I find replacement batteries for either of these phones?
Finding replacement batteries may be challenging. These phones are quite old, and battery availability is likely limited to third-party sellers or salvaged units. Compatibility can also be an issue, so careful research is required.
