The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G redefined the compact flagship, bringing a folding screen to a wider audience. Now, the Acer Super ZX enters the fray, offering a folding form factor at a potentially more accessible price point. This comparison dives deep into the hardware differences – specifically the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 versus the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ – to determine which device delivers the best experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a more refined software experience, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G remains the superior choice. However, the Acer Super ZX presents a compelling option for budget-conscious consumers willing to trade some processing power for a lower price and potentially faster charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International, Canada |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 41, 77, 78, 79 Sub6 - China, Hong Kong |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 41, 66, 71 Sub6 - Canada |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 26 | 2020, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 26 | Available. Released 2020, August 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Plastic front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 8.6 mm thickness | Unfolded: 167.3 x 73.6 x 7.2 mm Folded: 87.4 x 73.6 x 17.3 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2636 pixels (~425 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 101.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ |
| | - | Cover display:
Super AMOLED, 1.1 inches, 112 x 300 pixels |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.09 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.40 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G+ (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | Yes | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1.22µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 32-bit/384kHz audio
Tuned by AKG |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| | - | Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 35 min | 15W wired
9W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 3300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Carbon Black, Cosmic Green, Lunar Blue | Mystic Grey, Mystic Bronze, Mystic White |
| Models | - | SM-F707B, SM-F707N, SM-F7070, SM-F707U, SM-F707U1, SM-F707W |
| Price | ₹ 8,999 | About 800 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 1.01 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 1.45 W/kg (body) |
Acer Super ZX
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price
- Folding form factor at a lower entry point
- Less powerful Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Likely inferior camera performance
- Potentially less refined build quality
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 865+ performance
- More refined folding design and hinge
- Superior camera capabilities (likely)
- Slower 15W wired charging
- Higher price point
- Potential for throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both devices feature folding displays, the specifics are absent in the provided data. However, given Samsung’s history, the Z Flip 5G likely boasts a higher peak brightness and potentially a more durable Ultra Thin Glass (UTG) covering. The Super ZX, being a more budget-oriented device, may utilize a less advanced panel, potentially impacting color accuracy and outdoor visibility. The hinge mechanism is also a critical factor, and Samsung’s is known for its refinement, something the Super ZX will need to match to compete.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung typically prioritizes camera quality in its flagship and folding devices. The Z Flip 5G likely features a more sophisticated image signal processor (ISP) and potentially larger sensor sizes, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The Super ZX, aiming for cost-effectiveness, may employ more basic camera hardware. The absence of details suggests the Super ZX may not offer features like optical image stabilization (OIS) found in the Z Flip 5G.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G’s Snapdragon 865+ (7nm+) is a flagship-level processor with a prime Cortex-A77 core clocked at 3.09 GHz, supported by three additional A77 cores and four A55 cores. This configuration provides significantly more processing power than the Acer Super ZX’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The Dimensity 6300, with its 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, is geared towards efficient performance rather than outright speed. The 7nm+ process of the Snapdragon 865+ also offers better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Z Flip 5G will demonstrably outperform the Super ZX in CPU-intensive tasks and graphically demanding games.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G’s 15W wired and 9W wireless charging are relatively slow compared to the Acer Super ZX’s 33W wired charging. While the Z Flip 5G’s battery capacity is unknown, the slower charging speed suggests a smaller battery. The Super ZX’s 33W charging can deliver a 50% charge in just 35 minutes, offering a significant convenience advantage. However, the overall battery life will depend on the capacity of both devices and the efficiency of their respective chipsets and displays.
Buying Guide
Buy the Acer Super ZX if you need a folding phone experience on a tighter budget and value faster charging speeds. It's ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G if you prioritize top-tier performance for demanding applications, gaming, and benefit from Samsung’s established software ecosystem and more robust build quality.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 in the Acer Super ZX struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 6300 is a mid-range chipset. While it can handle many games, Genshin Impact and other graphically intensive titles will likely require reduced settings to maintain a playable frame rate. The Snapdragon 865+ in the Z Flip 5G will provide a smoother experience at higher settings.
❓ How does the slower charging speed of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G impact daily use?
The 15W charging on the Z Flip 5G means it will take considerably longer to fully charge compared to the Super ZX’s 33W charging. This is more noticeable if you frequently run out of battery and need a quick top-up. However, Samsung’s software optimizations may help mitigate battery drain.
❓ Is the folding screen on the Acer Super ZX as durable as the one on the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G?
Given Samsung’s experience with folding displays, the Z Flip 5G likely utilizes more advanced materials and construction techniques for increased durability. The Super ZX, being a newer entrant, may not have the same level of refinement in its folding mechanism and screen protection.
