The OnePlus 12R aims to deliver flagship performance at a more accessible price point, leveraging the power of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The Acer Super ZX Pro, meanwhile, opts for the Mediatek Dimensity 7400, focusing on a balance of efficiency and cost. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 12R emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides a significant performance advantage, coupled with incredibly fast 100W charging and a brighter display. While the Acer Super ZX Pro offers a respectable experience, it can't match the 12R's overall capabilities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 26 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | - | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black; other colors | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | - | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
Acer Super ZX Pro
- More affordable price point
- Efficient Dimensity 7400 chipset
- Potentially longer software support (Acer's track record)
- Significantly lower performance than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Slower 33W charging
- Likely inferior display brightness and quality
OnePlus 12R
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Ultra-fast 100W charging (26 minutes to full)
- Bright and vibrant display (1181 nits)
- Higher price tag
- Potential for more heat generation under sustained load
- OxygenOS software can be polarizing
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 12R boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1181 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Acer Super ZX Pro's display specifications are not provided, it's likely to fall short of this brightness level. The 12R's panel likely utilizes LTPO technology, enabling variable refresh rates for improved power efficiency, a feature not confirmed for the Acer. The brighter display on the 12R benefits content creators and consumers alike.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Acer Super ZX Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, given its price point, it's reasonable to assume it won't match the image quality of a flagship-level device like the OnePlus 12R. The 12R likely features a more sophisticated image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, enabling better noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image clarity. The OnePlus 12R's camera system will likely benefit from advanced computational photography features, enhancing image quality in various scenarios.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 12R's Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a flagship-level processor with a prime Cortex-X3 core clocked at 3.2 GHz, alongside high-performance Cortex-A715 and A710 cores. This architecture provides a substantial performance leap over the Acer Super ZX Pro's Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm). The Dimensity 7400, while efficient, utilizes older Cortex-A78 and A55 cores, resulting in lower peak performance and potentially more noticeable slowdowns during intensive tasks. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2's Adreno GPU also offers a significant advantage in graphics performance, crucial for gaming.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R excels in charging speed with its 100W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 26 minutes. The Acer Super ZX Pro's 33W charging is considerably slower. While the OnePlus 12R's battery capacity isn't specified, its active use score of 14:32h demonstrates excellent battery life. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2's improved efficiency contributes to this longevity. The slower charging speed of the Acer Super ZX Pro may be a significant inconvenience for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Acer Super ZX Pro if you prioritize a more budget-friendly option and are content with solid, everyday performance. It's ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and occasionally game. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you demand top-tier performance for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or heavy multitasking, and value the convenience of ultra-fast charging and a vibrant display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7400 in the Acer Super ZX Pro struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 7400 is capable of running Genshin Impact, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the OnePlus 12R offers a much smoother experience at higher settings, with less thermal throttling.
❓ How does the 100W charging on the OnePlus 12R affect battery health over the long term?
While fast charging was once a concern for battery degradation, modern smartphones employ sophisticated charging management systems to mitigate this. OnePlus's 100W SuperVOOC charging is designed to minimize heat and optimize charging cycles, minimizing long-term impact on battery health. However, consistent use of extremely fast charging *may* slightly accelerate degradation compared to slower charging methods.
❓ Is the difference in CPU performance between the Dimensity 7400 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 noticeable in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and email, the difference may not be immediately apparent. However, when multitasking, editing photos/videos, or running demanding applications, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2's superior processing power will result in a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience.
