The Acer Super ZX Pro enters the market as a compelling mid-range contender, while the Google Pixel 8 Pro represents Google’s latest flagship offering. This comparison dissects the core differences between these two devices, focusing on how their contrasting chipsets and feature sets cater to different user needs and budgets.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera capabilities and long-term software support, the Google Pixel 8 Pro is the clear winner. However, the Acer Super ZX Pro offers a strong performance-per-dollar ratio, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious users who prioritize raw processing power for everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 26 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | - | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom
48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min
23W wireless
Reverse wireless
Bypass charging |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black; other colors | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | - | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
Acer Super ZX Pro
- Strong performance-to-price ratio
- Efficient Mediatek Dimensity 7400 chipset
- 33W fast wired charging
- Camera likely less advanced than Pixel 8 Pro
- Limited software update commitment
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Exceptional camera system with AI enhancements
- Long-term software support from Google
- Bright and efficient display with LTPO
- Higher price point
- Tensor G3 may not match raw CPU power of some competitors
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 8 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1600 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Acer Super ZX Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower in peak brightness. The Pixel 8 Pro’s panel likely incorporates LTPO technology for variable refresh rates, contributing to improved battery efficiency. The Pixel 8 Pro’s display is a key advantage for outdoor use and media consumption.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro’s camera system is a major selling point, though specific sensor details are not provided. Google’s computational photography prowess, combined with the Tensor G3’s AI capabilities, delivers exceptional image quality. The Acer Super ZX Pro’s camera specifications are not detailed, suggesting a more standard approach. The Pixel 8 Pro’s video capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from advanced stabilization and processing. The Pixel 8 Pro’s camera is geared towards consistently high-quality results in various conditions, while the Super ZX Pro likely offers a more basic camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Acer Super ZX Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm), an octa-core processor geared towards efficient performance. The Google Pixel 8 Pro is powered by the Google Tensor G3 (4nm), a nona-core processor designed with a focus on AI and machine learning tasks. The Tensor G3’s Cortex-X3 prime core (3.0 GHz) offers a performance advantage in single-threaded applications, while the Dimensity 7400’s Cortex-A78 cores (2.6 GHz) provide strong multi-core performance. The Pixel 8 Pro’s architecture is more complex, prioritizing AI processing, while the Super ZX Pro focuses on a balanced CPU/GPU configuration. The Pixel 8 Pro will likely excel in tasks like image processing and voice recognition.
Battery Life
The Google Pixel 8 Pro demonstrates impressive battery endurance, achieving 11:14 hours of active use and an endurance rating of 90 hours. While the Acer Super ZX Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 33W wired charging is slightly slower than the Pixel 8 Pro’s 30W wired charging with PD3.0, PPS, and a 50% charge in 30 minutes. The Pixel 8 Pro also offers 23W wireless charging, reverse wireless charging, and bypass charging, features absent on the Super ZX Pro. The Pixel 8 Pro’s combination of battery life and versatile charging options provides a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Acer Super ZX Pro if you need a phone focused on efficient performance for daily tasks and light gaming, and value affordability above all else. Its Mediatek Dimensity 7400 chipset provides a solid foundation without the flagship price tag. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prioritize a best-in-class camera system, seamless software experience with guaranteed updates, and advanced AI features, even if it means a higher upfront investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Google Tensor G3 chip in the Pixel 8 Pro get noticeably warm during extended gaming sessions?
While the Tensor G3 is a capable chip, it's known to run warmer than some competing silicon, particularly during graphically intensive tasks like gaming. Google has implemented thermal management solutions, but users may experience some throttling after prolonged use. The Acer Super ZX Pro’s Dimensity 7400, being a more efficiency-focused chip, may exhibit less thermal throttling.
❓ How does the Pixel 8 Pro’s software update commitment compare to Acer’s support for the Super ZX Pro?
Google guarantees at least 7 years of software updates for the Pixel 8 Pro, including Android OS upgrades and security patches. Acer typically offers a shorter support window for its smartphones, usually around 2-3 years of OS updates and 3-4 years of security patches. This difference in software support is a significant advantage for the Pixel 8 Pro, ensuring long-term usability and security.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Acer Super ZX Pro fast enough for daily use, or will I find myself frequently needing to top up the battery?
33W charging is a respectable speed, but it's slower than the Pixel 8 Pro's 30W charging with PD3.0/PPS. While 33W will provide a decent charge overnight, users who frequently drain their battery may find the Pixel 8 Pro’s faster charging and wireless options more convenient.
