The Acer Iconia Tab P11 (2025) and Nokia T10 represent distinct approaches to the budget Android tablet market. The Nokia T10 prioritizes affordability and basic functionality, while the Acer P11 (2025) aims for a more balanced experience with a focus on performance. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Acer Iconia Tab P11 (2025) is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds compared to the Nokia T10’s Unisoc T606, resulting in a smoother and more responsive user experience. While the Nokia T10 offers a lower price point, the performance trade-off is substantial.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, Q4 | 2022, July 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, Q4 | Available. Released 2022, August 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 265.2 x 169.9 x 8.1 mm (10.44 x 6.69 x 0.32 in) | 208 x 123.2 x 9 mm (8.19 x 4.85 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 550 g (1.21 lb) | 375 g (13.23 oz) |
| | - | Splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~212 ppi density) | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 344.4 cm2 (~76.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 360 nits (typ), 450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 8 MP, 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 2 MP, 1/5.0", 1.65µm |
| Video | Yes | 720p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | Unspecified | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 8000 mAh | Li-Po 5250 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Iron Gray | Ocean Blue |
| Models | P11-11-8113 | TA-1503, TA-1472, TA-1462, TA-1457 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.27 W/kg (head) 1.57 W/kg (body) |
Acer Iconia Tab P11 (2025)
- Significantly faster processor (Helio G99)
- Faster charging (20W)
- More efficient chipset (6nm process)
- Likely higher price point
- May have similar display quality to the Nokia T10
Nokia T10
- Lower price point
- Acceptable for basic tasks
- Potentially longer battery life if equipped with a larger capacity battery
- Slow processor (Unisoc T606)
- Slow charging (10W)
- Less efficient chipset (12nm process)
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. However, the Acer P11 (2025), being the more premium offering, likely benefits from a higher peak brightness and potentially better color accuracy. The Nokia T10, aiming for cost savings, may have wider viewing angle limitations. Bezels are expected to be relatively substantial on both devices, typical of this market segment.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market segment, both tablets likely feature modest camera setups. It's reasonable to assume the Acer P11 (2025) may have a slightly higher resolution main sensor, but image quality will largely depend on software processing. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is unlikely on either device. Focusing on the chipset's ISP capabilities, the Helio G99 likely offers superior image processing compared to the Unisoc T606, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Acer Iconia Tab P11 (2025) features the Mediatek Helio G99, a 6nm processor with an octa-core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). This is a substantial upgrade over the Nokia T10’s Unisoc T606 (12nm), which uses a less efficient manufacturing process and a slightly older CPU architecture (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55). The 6nm process of the Helio G99 translates to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, allowing for sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Cortex-A76 cores in the Acer are also more powerful than the A75 cores in the Nokia, resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified, but the charging speeds reveal a key difference. The Acer Iconia Tab P11 (2025) supports 20W wired charging, while the Nokia T10 is limited to 10W. This means the Acer will charge significantly faster, reducing downtime. While a larger battery capacity on the Nokia T10 could offset the slower charging, the more efficient Helio G99 in the Acer P11 (2025) will likely result in comparable or even better real-world battery life, despite potentially having a smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Acer Iconia Tab P11 (2025) if you need a tablet capable of handling multitasking, moderate gaming, and demanding applications without significant lag. Buy the Nokia T10 if your primary use case is basic media consumption, light web browsing, and you prioritize extreme affordability above all else. The T10 is best suited for users who need a secondary device for simple tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T606 in the Nokia T10 struggle with multiple apps open simultaneously?
Yes, the Unisoc T606 is a relatively low-powered chipset. Running multiple apps, especially demanding ones, will likely result in noticeable lag and slowdowns. The Nokia T10 is best suited for single-tasking or light multitasking with simple applications.
❓ How much faster is the Acer Iconia Tab P11 (2025) for gaming compared to the Nokia T10?
The Acer Iconia Tab P11 (2025) offers a substantial gaming performance advantage. The Helio G99's more powerful CPU and GPU, combined with its 6nm process, will allow for smoother frame rates and a more enjoyable gaming experience, even with moderately demanding titles. The Nokia T10 will struggle with most modern games.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the Nokia T10 a significant drawback?
Yes, 10W charging is quite slow by modern standards. Expect it to take several hours to fully charge the Nokia T10 from 0%. The Acer Iconia Tab P11 (2025)'s 20W charging will significantly reduce charging times, making it more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
