Acer Iconia A14 vs Nokia T20: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Tablet Buyers

The Acer Iconia A14 and Nokia T20 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget tablet space. Both aim to deliver a functional Android experience without breaking the bank, but they achieve this through different approaches to chipset selection and feature prioritization. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which tablet offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Nokia T20 emerges as the better choice. Its brighter, higher-contrast display significantly enhances media consumption, and while the Unisoc T610 isn't a performance powerhouse, it's comparable to the Allwinner A733 while offering a more refined software experience. The A14's value proposition is diminished by its less impressive screen.

PHONES
Phone Names Acer Iconia A14 Nokia T20
Network
2G bandsN/AGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsN/AHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - US, LATAM
4G bandsN/A1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 40, 66 - US, LATAM
EDGENo-
GPRSNo-
Speed-HSPA, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps - cellular model only
TechnologyNo cellular connectivityGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International
Launch
Announced2025, September 032021, October 06
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, NovemberAvailable. Released 2021, November 02
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum frameGlass front, aluminum back
Dimensions324.6 x 211 x 8 mm (12.78 x 8.31 x 0.31 in)247.6 x 157.5 x 7.8 mm (9.75 x 6.20 x 0.31 in)
SIMNoNano-SIM (cellular model only)
Weight910 g (2.01 lb)465 g (Wi-Fi), 470 g (LTE) (1.03 lb)
 -Splash resistant
Display
Protection-Scratch-resistant glass
Resolution1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~162 ppi density)1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~224 ppi density)
Size14.0 inches, 568.3 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio)10.4 inches, 307.9 cm2 (~78.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 400 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetAllwinner A733 (12 nm)Unisoc T610 (12 nm)
GPUIMG BXM-4-64 MC01Mali-G52 MP2
OSAndroid 15Android 11, upgradable to Android 13
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal256GB 8GB RAM32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flashLED flash
Single8 MP, AF8 MP, AF
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single5 MP5 MP
VideoYesYes
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers)Yes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningNoGPS - cellular model only
RadioNoFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer
Battery
Charging-15W wired
Type8000 mAhLi-Po 8200 mAh
Misc
ColorsVapor SilverDeep Ocean
ModelsA14-M1NTA-1397, TA-1394, TA-1392
PriceAbout 260 EURAbout 200 EUR
SAR-1.34 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-1.35 W/kg (body)

Acer Iconia A14

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Cortex-A76 cores offer slight single-core performance edge
  • Functional for basic tasks

  • Likely inferior display quality
  • Less refined software experience
  • Unknown battery and charging details

Nokia T20

  • Brighter and higher contrast display
  • More optimized software experience
  • 15W wired charging

  • Cortex-A75 cores offer slightly lower single-core performance
  • Unisoc chipset may have limited long-term software support
  • Not ideal for demanding gaming

Display Comparison

The Nokia T20 boasts a clear advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 422 nits and a 1786:1 contrast ratio. This translates to a more visible screen outdoors and richer, more defined images. The Acer Iconia A14’s display specifications are not provided, suggesting a lower-tier panel. The Nokia T20’s superior contrast ratio will be particularly noticeable when viewing dark content, offering deeper blacks and a more immersive experience. While both tablets likely utilize IPS LCD technology, the Nokia’s measured specs indicate a significantly better viewing experience.

Camera Comparison

Neither tablet is positioned as a photography powerhouse, and detailed camera specifications are lacking for the Acer Iconia A14. The Nokia T20’s camera details are also limited, suggesting a focus on functionality rather than image quality. Given the target market, both tablets likely feature basic camera setups suitable for video calls and occasional snapshots. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner; however, the Nokia brand generally prioritizes image processing, potentially offering slightly more refined results.

Performance

Both tablets utilize 12nm process technology, but differ in their core architectures. The Acer Iconia A14 features the Allwinner A733, pairing two 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores with six 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Nokia T20, on the other hand, employs the Unisoc T610, with two 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and six 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While clock speeds are similar, the Cortex-A76 in the A14 generally offers slightly better single-core performance than the A75 in the T20. However, the Unisoc T610 benefits from better software optimization and driver support, potentially leading to a more consistent and smoother overall experience. Neither chipset is designed for demanding tasks, but both should handle everyday apps and light multitasking adequately.

Battery Life

Battery capacity data is missing for both devices. However, the Nokia T20 supports 15W wired charging, which, while not fast, is a standard offering in this price range. The Acer Iconia A14’s charging capabilities are unknown. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the Nokia T20’s more efficient chipset and potentially optimized software could translate to slightly longer runtimes. Without knowing the battery capacities, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement, but the 15W charging on the T20 provides a tangible advantage.

Buying Guide

Buy the Acer Iconia A14 if your primary need is a basic tablet for light tasks like web browsing and document editing, and you prioritize the absolute lowest price point. Buy the Nokia T20 if you value a more enjoyable viewing experience with a brighter, more vibrant display, and are willing to spend a little more for a smoother, more polished user experience. The T20 is also a better fit for users who consume a lot of video content.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Unisoc T610 in the Nokia T20 powerful enough for multitasking?
The Unisoc T610 is capable of handling moderate multitasking with several apps open simultaneously. However, it's not designed for intensive tasks like video editing or demanding 3D games. For typical use cases like web browsing, email, and social media, it provides a smooth and responsive experience.
❓ How does the display on the Nokia T20 perform in direct sunlight?
The Nokia T20’s 422 nits of peak brightness is respectable for a budget tablet and should provide adequate visibility even in direct sunlight. While it won't be as vibrant as a high-end tablet, it's significantly better than displays with lower peak brightness, making it suitable for outdoor use.
❓ Does the Acer Iconia A14 support expandable storage via microSD card?
While not explicitly stated in the provided data, tablets in this price range often include microSD card slots for expandable storage. It's highly probable that the Acer Iconia A14 supports microSD cards, but it's best to confirm this specification before purchasing.
❓ What kind of software updates can I expect on the Nokia T20?
Nokia generally provides a commitment to software updates and security patches for its tablets. While the exact number of updates is not guaranteed, the Nokia T20 is likely to receive at least a couple of major Android version updates and regular security patches, offering better long-term software support than many competitors in this price bracket.