The Acer Liquid S272E4 and Liquid X2 represent Acer's attempts to capture different segments of the budget smartphone market. The S272E4, with its newer chipset, aims for improved performance, while the X2 prioritizes long-lasting battery life. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Acer Acerone Liquid S272E4 is the better choice. Its Mediatek MT6765X chipset, built on a 12nm process, offers a significant performance advantage over the older, 28nm MT6753 in the Liquid X2, making it more responsive for everyday tasks and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe, Taiwan |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | LTE 800 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | LTE 700 / 900 / 1800 - Taiwan |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 25 | 2015, April. Released 2016, February |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 171 x 78.6 x 8.9 mm (6.73 x 3.09 x 0.35 in) | 153.3 x 78.8 x 8.5 mm (6.04 x 3.10 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Triple SIM (Micro-SIM) |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 166 g (5.86 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 350 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765X (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6753 (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-T720MP4 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 5.1 (Lollipop) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 20 MP, (wide), AF
0.3 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/1.8, AF |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | 13 MP, f/1.8, AF |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 820 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 23 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue | Black, Gold |
| Models | ZL.H01SI.002 | - |
| Price | - | About 230 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -86.1dB / Crosstalk -88.1dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 85h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 950 (nominal), 2.084 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 61dB / Noise 62dB / Ring 67dB
|
| Performance | - |
Basemark OS II 2.0: 825Basemark X: 4300 |
Acer Acerone Liquid S272E4
- Faster processor for smoother performance
- More modern chipset architecture (12nm)
- Potentially better power efficiency with MT6765X
- Battery life details are unknown
- Camera specifications are not provided
Acer Liquid X2
- Excellent battery endurance (85 hours)
- Good display contrast ratio in sunlight
- Likely lower price point due to older hardware
- Significantly slower processor
- Older, less efficient chipset (28nm)
- Camera specifications are not provided
Display Comparison
Both the Acer Acerone Liquid S272E4 and the Acer Liquid X2 share the same display characteristics: a contrast ratio of 950 (nominal) and 2.084 in sunlight. This suggests a similar viewing experience in both indoor and outdoor conditions. However, the lack of information regarding panel type (IPS, AMOLED) and resolution prevents a deeper analysis of image quality. The identical contrast ratios indicate neither phone offers a significant advantage in color vibrancy or black levels.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing features. This makes a direct comparison impossible. Without knowing the megapixel count or sensor technology, it's difficult to assess the image quality of either phone. The absence of details suggests both cameras are likely entry-level, geared towards casual photography rather than serious enthusiasts.
Performance
The Acerone Liquid S272E4’s Mediatek MT6765X (12nm) chipset represents a substantial upgrade over the Liquid X2’s MT6753 (28nm). The 12nm process allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency compared to the older 28nm node. The S272E4’s octa-core CPU, featuring a combination of 2.2 GHz and 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, will deliver noticeably faster performance than the X2’s 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This translates to quicker app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall user experience. While both utilize an octa-core configuration, the architectural improvements and higher clock speeds of the MT6765X give the S272E4 a clear edge.
Battery Life
The Acer Liquid X2 boasts an endurance rating of 85 hours, a strong indicator of excellent battery life. However, the Acerone Liquid S272E4’s battery capacity and charging specifications are not provided. The X2’s endurance rating suggests a large battery capacity combined with the power efficiency of its older chipset. While the S272E4’s newer chipset *could* offer improved power efficiency in certain scenarios, the X2’s established 85-hour rating provides a concrete benchmark for longevity. Without knowing the S272E4’s battery size and charging speed, it’s difficult to definitively say which phone offers a better overall battery experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Acer Acerone Liquid S272E4 if you prioritize a smoother user experience and faster app loading times, even if it means potentially sacrificing some battery endurance. This phone is ideal for users who frequently multitask or enjoy casual gaming. Buy the Acer Liquid X2 if maximizing battery life is your absolute top priority, and you primarily use your phone for basic communication and light web browsing. It's a good option for those who often find themselves away from a charger for extended periods.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek MT6765X in the Acerone Liquid S272E4 capable of running demanding games like PUBG?
While the MT6765X is an improvement over the MT6753, it's still a budget chipset. PUBG may be playable at lower settings and frame rates. Expect some lag or stuttering, especially in intense scenes. It's best suited for casual gaming rather than competitive, high-graphics experiences.
❓ How does the 85-hour endurance rating of the Acer Liquid X2 translate to real-world usage?
The 85-hour endurance rating is based on Acer's testing methodology, which likely involves a mix of standby time, calls, and light data usage. In real-world scenarios, your mileage will vary depending on your usage patterns. Heavy users who stream videos, play games, or use GPS frequently will experience significantly shorter battery life, but it should still comfortably last a full day.
❓ Given the lack of camera details, should I expect similar photo quality from both phones?
It's reasonable to assume the camera performance will be comparable, but likely basic. Both phones appear to target the budget segment, and without specific sensor information, it's safe to say neither will excel in low-light conditions or offer advanced features like optical image stabilization. Expect acceptable photos for social media sharing, but not professional-quality results.
