The Acer Liquid S262F5 and Liquid Jade Z represent vastly different eras of smartphone technology. The Jade Z, built around the aging MT6732, targets the ultra-budget segment, while the S262F5, powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 6400, aims for a more competitive mid-range experience. This comparison dissects the core differences, revealing a significant performance gap.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the vast majority of users, the Acer Liquid S262F5 is the clear winner. Its modern Dimensity 6400 chipset delivers substantially faster processing speeds and improved efficiency, making it suitable for gaming, multitasking, and future software updates. The Jade Z remains viable only for extremely basic use cases.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 7, 20 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 26, 28, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 22 | 2015, March. Released 2015, April |
| Status | Available. Released Exp. release 2025, October | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 171 x 77.8 x 8.9 mm (6.73 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 143.5 x 69.8 x 8 mm (5.65 x 2.75 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202.8 g (7.16 oz) | 110 g (3.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~265 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.76 inches, 108.5 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 380 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6732 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-T760MP2 |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 5.0 (Lollipop) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDHC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 8GB 1GB RAM (Jade Z), 16GB 2GB RAM (Jade Z+) |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, AF
2 MP, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/1.8, AF |
| Triple | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 16 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 410 h (2G) / Up to 400 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 7 h (2G) / Up to 4 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 2300 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue | Black, White |
| Models | ZL.A01SU.04P | BLADE V0850 |
| Price | - | About 200 EUR |
Acer Acerone Liquid S262F5
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 6400)
- More efficient chipset (6nm process)
- Likely better camera performance
- Potential for longer software support
- Price is likely higher than the Jade Z
- Specific display details are unknown
Acer Liquid Jade Z
- Extremely affordable
- Simple and easy to use for basic tasks
- Compact size (likely)
- Lightweight (likely)
- Outdated processor (MT6732)
- Poor performance with modern apps
- Limited battery life
- Likely no software updates
Display Comparison
Information regarding display specifications (resolution, panel type, refresh rate) is absent for both devices. However, given the Jade Z’s age and target market, it likely features a lower resolution and less color-accurate panel than a modern device like the S262F5. The S262F5, benefiting from newer manufacturing processes, likely has improved viewing angles and brightness. Bezels are expected to be significantly larger on the Jade Z, reflecting its older design.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond the presence of cameras are unavailable. However, the Jade Z, being an older budget device, likely features lower-resolution sensors and lacks advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS). The S262F5, positioned in a higher segment, likely incorporates a more capable camera system with a larger sensor and improved image processing capabilities. While specific megapixel counts are unknown, the S262F5’s chipset likely supports more advanced image signal processing (ISP) features, resulting in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions.
Performance
The performance disparity is the most significant difference. The Acerone Liquid S262F5’s Mediatek Dimensity 6400, built on a 6nm process, features an octa-core configuration with a powerful combination of 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts sharply with the Liquid Jade Z’s quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 processor fabricated on a dated 28nm node. The Dimensity 6400’s architecture provides a substantial increase in both single-core and multi-core performance, translating to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface. The 6nm process also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling under sustained load. The Jade Z’s MT6732 will struggle with demanding applications and modern mobile games.
Battery Life
Battery capacity data is missing for both devices. However, the Dimensity 6400’s superior power efficiency, stemming from its 6nm fabrication process, will likely result in longer battery life for the S262F5, even with a similar battery capacity to the Jade Z. The Jade Z’s older, less efficient chipset will consume more power, leading to shorter runtimes. Charging wattage is also unknown, but the S262F5 is more likely to support faster charging technologies.
Buying Guide
Buy the Acer Acerone Liquid S262F5 if you need a phone capable of handling modern apps, occasional gaming, and benefit from longer software support. Its superior processing power and efficient chipset are crucial for a smooth user experience. Buy the Acer Liquid Jade Z if you prioritize absolute affordability and only require a phone for calls, texts, and very light web browsing; understand that performance will be limited and software updates unlikely.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Acer Liquid Jade Z struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
Yes, the MT6732 chipset in the Jade Z is significantly underpowered for modern applications. While basic functionality might be possible, expect slow loading times, frequent lag, and potential crashes when using apps like Facebook, WhatsApp, or even updated web browsers.
❓ Is the Acer Acerone Liquid S262F5 a good choice for mobile gaming?
The Liquid S262F5, with its Dimensity 6400, is capable of handling many mobile games at medium settings. While it won't compete with flagship gaming phones, it offers a significantly better gaming experience than the Jade Z, thanks to its more powerful CPU and GPU.
❓ How long will Acer likely support the Liquid Jade Z with software updates?
Given the age of the Liquid Jade Z and its low-end positioning, it's highly unlikely to receive any further software updates. Security patches and OS upgrades are no longer expected.
❓ What kind of user would benefit most from the Acer Liquid Jade Z?
The Jade Z is best suited for users who only need a phone for basic communication – making calls, sending texts, and perhaps very light web browsing. It's a good option for those on an extremely tight budget who don't require smartphone features.
