The Acer Acerone Liquid S162E4 and Acer Liquid E600 represent Acer's attempts to capture the budget smartphone market. While both aim for affordability, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, specifically the chipset. This comparison dissects the Mediatek MT6765 in the S162E4 against the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 in the E600, revealing which device offers a better user experience for the price.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and multitasking, the Acerone Liquid S162E4 is the better choice. Its Mediatek MT6765 chipset, despite being older, offers a substantial performance uplift over the Snapdragon 400 in the E600 due to its octa-core configuration and more modern architecture. However, the E600 may offer slightly better battery life due to its more efficient manufacturing process.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 7, 20 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | LTE: 800 / 1700(AWS) 1800 / 1900 / 2100 / 2600 MHz |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 25 | 2014, June. Released 2014, September |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 76.9 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 147 x 72 x 9.5 mm (5.79 x 2.83 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~196 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~65.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 350 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 (12 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8926 Snapdragon 400 (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 305 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 (KitKat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 4GB 1GB RAM, 16GB 2GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 4.5 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), AF | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 2 MP or VGA |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Talk time | - | Up to 6 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 2500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue | Black, Green, Dark red |
| Models | ZL.H01SI.001 | - |
| Price | - | About 200 EUR |
Acer Acerone Liquid S162E4
- Significantly faster processor for smoother multitasking.
- Octa-core CPU handles demanding apps better.
- More modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A53).
- Potentially better image processing due to chipset power.
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load.
- 12nm process may generate more heat than 28nm.
Acer Liquid E600
- Potentially longer standby time due to efficient manufacturing process.
- Simpler user experience for basic tasks.
- Lower price point (likely).
- Snapdragon chipset generally known for stable connectivity.
- Slow processor struggles with multitasking.
- Quad-core CPU limits performance in demanding apps.
- Older CPU architecture (Cortex-A7).
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, display specifications are not provided for either device. However, given their market segment, it's reasonable to assume both utilize LCD panels with 720p resolution. The Acerone S162E4's more powerful chipset *could* support a slightly higher refresh rate, but this is speculative. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, reflecting their budget nature. Color accuracy is unlikely to be a strong point on either model.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not detailed, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given the price point, both devices likely feature basic camera setups. It's probable that the Acerone S162E4’s more capable chipset allows for slightly faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance, even with similar sensors. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality; these sensors are often included for marketing purposes rather than practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Acerone S162E4’s Mediatek MT6765 (12nm) features an octa-core CPU comprised of four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.3 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Acer Liquid E600’s Qualcomm MSM8926 Snapdragon 400 (28nm) which has a quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU. The MT6765’s octa-core design and newer Cortex-A53 architecture provide a significant advantage in multi-threaded tasks and overall responsiveness. The 12nm manufacturing process of the MT6765 is also more efficient than the 28nm process of the Snapdragon 400, though the difference may be offset by the higher clock speeds. Users will notice a marked difference in app loading times and multitasking performance on the Acerone S162E4.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Snapdragon 400’s 28nm process is inherently more power-efficient than the MT6765’s 12nm process *at idle*. However, under load, the MT6765’s efficiency gains become more apparent. The Acer Liquid E600 may offer slightly longer standby times, but the Acerone S162E4 will likely perform better during active use. Charging wattage is also unknown, making it impossible to compare 0-100% charging times.
Buying Guide
Buy the Acer Acerone Liquid S162E4 if you need a phone capable of handling multiple apps simultaneously, light gaming, and generally smoother operation. This is the phone for users who value performance over absolute battery longevity. Buy the Acer Liquid E600 if you prioritize simplicity, basic functionality, and potentially longer standby times, and are willing to accept a slower, less responsive experience. This phone is best suited for users who primarily make calls, send texts, and occasionally browse the web.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Acerone Liquid S162E4 be able to run popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Mediatek MT6765 chipset in the Acerone Liquid S162E4 is more than capable of running social media apps smoothly. Its octa-core CPU and more modern architecture provide sufficient processing power for these applications, even with multiple apps open simultaneously.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 400 in the Acer Liquid E600 sufficient for basic web browsing and email?
Yes, the Snapdragon 400 is adequate for basic web browsing and email. However, expect slower page loading times and occasional lag, especially with multiple browser tabs open. It's best suited for light usage and users who don't require a fast or responsive experience.
❓ Can I expect to play any modern mobile games on either of these phones?
While both phones can technically run some mobile games, the experience will be limited. The Acerone Liquid S162E4 will handle less demanding games better, but even then, expect low graphics settings and potential frame rate drops. The Snapdragon 400 in the E600 will struggle with most modern titles.
❓ Which phone is better for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
The Acer Liquid E600 is the better choice for users who primarily make calls and send texts. Its simpler chipset and potentially longer standby time make it a reliable option for basic communication needs. The Acerone S162E4's more powerful chipset is overkill for these tasks.
