Redmi Turbo 5 Max teased, should arrive later this month

  • Posted on Jan. 5, 2026, 9:01 p.m.
The echoes of the New Year’s Eve 2024 fireworks had barely faded when Xiaomiunveiled the Redmi Turbo 4. Then in late April, the companyfollowed up with the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro. This year we expect no less than three Turbo models on the way and the new addition may come first – Xiaomi posted a teaser for the Turbo 5 Max. The Max will be the fastest phone with the best battery in the CNY 2,500 price segment, says Xiaomi. This converts to $360/€305/₹32,500, though as always, keep in mind that global prices tend to be higher than a simple currency conversion would suggest. Redmi Turbo 5 Max teaser
Tech article image
Tech article image
Previously,we heard thatthe Redmi Turbo 5 will feature a Dimensity 8500, while the Turbo 5 Pro will use a Dimensity 9500e (supposedly a lower bin version of the 9500, though see below). Pro will have100W charging, according to data from the 3C. It is said to have a 1.5K LTPS OLED display and an ultrasonic fingerprint reader. The Pro is interesting, by the way, because last year the Redmi Turbo 4 Prolaunched internationally as the Poco F7. Will the Redmi Turbo 5 Pro become the F8? Maybe. And what of the Max? Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 • Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
Tech article image
Tech article image
Tech article image
Tech article image
@DigitalChatStationreports that the new series will debut this month. The Redmi Turbo 5 Max will allegedly have a “Dimensity 9500s” chipset, which will be a variant of the 9400+. There may have been some mix-up with the naming – last year, theDimensity 9400ewas a rebadged 9300+, so the 9500e should be based on the 9400+. Not that chipset names follow any logic. ThePoco F8 ProandF8 Ultraare already official with Snapdragon 8 Elite chips (one original, one Gen 5), so the Redmi Turbo 5 Max will have different hardware than them. The Pro model might still serve as the basis of the vanilla F8, though. Source(in Chinese)
You May Also Like

0 Responses Write a Response

Leave Your Response